Re: [spring] one typo in OSPF SR extension

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Thu, 18 May 2017 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00D2129B89 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2017 02:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XYbmWSdVEWga for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2017 02:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FA2A129B5D for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 May 2017 01:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=795; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1495097717; x=1496307317; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WmVjG1kWoHt6z0qveF/N3mIDx9XB6qyiaxF/8foUURg=; b=bB6PKY+9BfbXejAfXVRRxQjjjo+HiIvtKNbyKBWgbxXbm+7UsVV/TYHj 58QQSP3koa+MqaeQL0h8eLJpn0wQQ1q3lYySLe/JscNtobxQlDjHTkC3i ObAS8d4ZN6jCltE2jTgSWFRru1JRUe4jVu5Dd2q/Ote5FgUvJI0qaaA6r 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CMAABbYB1Z/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhDeBDI4Fc5B2lXaCDyENhSxKAoYoGAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRkBAQEDAQE2NgoRCxgJFg8JAwIBAgEVMAYBDAYCAQGKHw6vfhKKfgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARsFhl+BXoMbilUBBIlGlE2TG4FsiRiGapRGHziBCi8gCBkVRoR3HIFlPjYBiDEBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,358,1491264000"; d="scan'208";a="652955274"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 May 2017 08:55:15 +0000
Received: from [10.147.24.61] ([10.147.24.61]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v4I8tFwP021125; Thu, 18 May 2017 08:55:15 GMT
Message-ID: <591D6174.3090701@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 10:55:16 +0200
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chao Fu <chao.fu@ericsson.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
References: <VI1PR07MB1071C2922D204E4811066A9A91E40@VI1PR07MB1071.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR07MB1071C2922D204E4811066A9A91E40@VI1PR07MB1071.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/_cuUcRgPjRbPvhRnSTxRmiI_Wc4>
Subject: Re: [spring] one typo in OSPF SR extension
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 09:00:53 -0000

Hi Chao,

thanks, will fix it.

Peter


On 18/05/17 10:21 , Chao Fu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is one typo in Section 8.4.2 of
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-14.txt,
>
> Section 8.4.2 says:.
>
>     When Segment Routing is used, each router on the broadcast, NBMSA, or
>
>                                                                                                                     -----------  Should be NBMA
>
>     hybrid network MAY advertise the Adj-SID for its adjacency to the DR
>
>     using the Adj-SID Sub-TLV as described in Section 7.1.
>
> Regards,
>
> Chao Fu
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>