IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding-10

Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com> Sun, 02 August 2020 04:11 UTC

Return-Path: <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034673A0BD1 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 21:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=futurewei.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JNh_0AgdLbFQ for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 21:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr680100.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.68.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F50A3A0BD2 for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 21:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Mr9qutpbgWydb1Ml4GU3KYTxH7NuYl/QjxNcL0Lbe1C8fkPzn+/LE+ZvQGRxw23lnXYrRhKE4dCaDAP1jhs2vPBnXpImNgPkQiYcuOOYywfnSKMZE3BHpOkC5NBZL6TM2f1TL9LIkCJhxCd0iFdYBJ6u1GaFcF8vU6Kosd9WidTvA1G0hSKr95C+N85x4DksS0A9lsFV+D7NALs5SLakis+vwv65gRUpyOKCkqaEBcAB5L9c3KF0kuYAqHOrIDxj9tUekyBWOvM+LWiBrdR0SEBj3HaD3jMg6WS/zlQabdKkyqbVnnzGnEYguYS7BOiEODBLoHWzZnPZ2Brxb0zkqQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YTvUT4AYh3BnwvD7TfDCnchMmujcMG5oygwTx+dRVRA=; b=KooyW1ln27AqwuKTJ3Fy5ofI2DMtv+ln+l+IhmpRl5SUE9qT9XRIYCRfj3n1NYbH/qPp4VUELWOEVgMrB+zPiocwyL8XUl6nGX+jjCs5ukfjcCK1u9AQnuaTUyOKql79l+m8Ds2v0RFJfNnF++WpP1sgJ9Stn9ih7yhfXf4ZdLmU16f3139QlfmZfcmfjhSEqM8eNpjKNQTMIyEosibOmcpCAZCjg5okZj8daFmeLU5Uy+T5fTyn7Y0Fd84+Gu/qs2TPqIssWQ5SkOfF0B/ZkG8ai+20vw99vWrWfUewCyBQOuMPrd1usBRF5+i5ts8pGuiqiVzj7gxUN+NUn60MhQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=futurewei.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=futurewei.com; dkim=pass header.d=futurewei.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Futurewei.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YTvUT4AYh3BnwvD7TfDCnchMmujcMG5oygwTx+dRVRA=; b=GHyBdrThqU8kJrvHwvYEtswe2PwvZe+1JflP7Er/bHo4z3vqqXyq+dq4yQ0dhi5EMTFz6jUxd15aqAi0oR56syzVQOeO213IjSE/tRJv38/MBfJ+ybilkmGObvi6ggZ19SYVI12te2Td4GVrpgpKuChUvxPGgNxNfRg3H6XxwmA=
Received: from MN2PR13MB3117.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:13a::20) by MN2PR13MB4039.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:269::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3261.13; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 04:11:26 +0000
Received: from MN2PR13MB3117.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::bd0d:e70d:94e5:81e7]) by MN2PR13MB3117.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::bd0d:e70d:94e5:81e7%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3261.013; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 04:11:26 +0000
From: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
CC: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding-10
Thread-Index: AQHWaH7G6cgJgixKvkCyZxnoixrS5qkkLe5L
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 04:11:25 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR13MB31171EE249DB93781268AE9CF24C0@MN2PR13MB3117.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR13MB31176119A2609320CAAE2D32F24C0@MN2PR13MB3117.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR13MB31176119A2609320CAAE2D32F24C0@MN2PR13MB3117.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=futurewei.com;
x-originating-ip: [73.114.233.24]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ee61fdb9-9be3-4b3c-2c90-08d8369a1ff4
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR13MB4039:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR13MB4039A1AB006D90790203B26FF24C0@MN2PR13MB4039.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ale8nCjvce9ZyDP4iuo5q4yQSjBt9tnQe7TlcS8yP3K4emfG7G7TIfxZDVFkHODW+TLU4N4R+xdOcE20zYi6l3NlRPVr2++nTV+4oHPeWRuq+fd7vEizmmxsOUVo7MP2Axg80vU/VorJaAsFc5Fe0Y5jTBEl61PjPFS1AWyKIo/GahH71fMzU5B1uFGmiJnXA0+BWD4MbwdBMr5yhvmdRR+B2W0zZQZjGYyWGB2sRchx3MyHxnWgvrtLI/iU/FVlqQ84Mh64ewDz3u2zwLUPF3ypgntRKeWVnQsqjtUyUP/W6++FZY/+gXhcopzVj3Oz7KGd5q7keKBOmkpvaQLNsQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR13MB3117.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39830400003)(376002)(396003)(346002)(366004)(136003)(478600001)(8676002)(86362001)(52536014)(6916009)(5660300002)(2906002)(54906003)(316002)(8936002)(4326008)(66476007)(71200400001)(44832011)(26005)(7696005)(33656002)(2940100002)(76116006)(83380400001)(9686003)(19627405001)(55016002)(53546011)(66556008)(66446008)(66946007)(6506007)(186003)(64756008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR13MB31171EE249DB93781268AE9CF24C0MN2PR13MB3117namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Futurewei.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR13MB3117.namprd13.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ee61fdb9-9be3-4b3c-2c90-08d8369a1ff4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Aug 2020 04:11:25.9875 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0fee8ff2-a3b2-4018-9c75-3a1d5591fedc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: wWwUuqHSFPIGjFw5O2S9BuEYiVdcGy2A2q86R2Dg3yWpfWgw/xcGAtOWhNnBi6oee/Dsc/FCt74Xpa42tdkM8Q==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR13MB4039
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/qpqvXK1wiiK2gfayVLzHjYt5314>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding-10
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 04:11:30 -0000

Hi Peter,

    Thank you very much for your valuable comment in IETF 104.

[peter psenak] no problem with node protection -- but I don’t consider that pretending a SID that has gone is a good idea. There can be second failures. If you need this kind of protection then we should precompute disjoint path.

    You are right. A backup disjoint path should be pre-computed.   For protecting a node, the proxy forwarding pre-computes a backup disjoint path assuming that the node is down. This seems similar to other local protections such as TILFA and LFA.

Best Regards,
Huaimo on behalf of co-authors
________________________________
From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2020 11:45 PM
To: Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
Cc: spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding-10

Hi Bruno,

    Thank you very much for your valuable comments in IETF 104.


[Bruno] Clarify in the draft -- nhop will not disappear. IP prefix may be used by BGP.

[H] …

[Bruno] Follow up on the list.

    We have clarified it in the draft uploaded.

Best Regards,
Huaimo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email