IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea

"Voyer, Daniel" <daniel.voyer@bell.ca> Fri, 28 February 2020 02:04 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=320bdfc2a=daniel.voyer@bell.ca>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41B23A0C06 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:04:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKT_0NyaJlWs for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:04:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ESA2-Wyn.bell.ca (esa2-wyn.bell.ca [67.69.243.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB1033A0C09 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:04:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dm5cch-d01.bellca.int.bell.ca (HELO DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca) ([198.235.102.31]) by esa02corp-wyn.bell.corp.bce.ca with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2020 21:04:11 -0500
Received: from DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8eb6:120e::8eb6:120e) by DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8eb6:120e::8eb6:120e) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 21:04:10 -0500
Received: from DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::75af:23bf:bdc5:ef10]) by DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::75af:23bf:bdc5:ef10%22]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 21:04:10 -0500
From: "Voyer, Daniel" <daniel.voyer@bell.ca>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
CC: "Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong@huawei.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [EXT]Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea
Thread-Index: AQHV7bJ0bpOy+REWkUqOZdp+v4Gd96gv7gOA///tSoA=
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 02:04:10 +0000
Message-ID: <E5317B44-1B5A-45FF-92AC-1A45D9E84635@bell.ca>
References: <5c2a4b36-0c59-709e-23eb-00f4aa1ce52f@joelhalpern.com> <9B89F4C2-5594-4D31-8893-21F3F4A0DF6C@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB569969EE8D1929E7069E1BB0AE550@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <58ED78D3-9E0C-4556-8853-8754B361DF6D@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB5699D79B1FC40662EE9E95B6AE500@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <81A30B25-9857-467E-85AE-1FE84B6F3197@cisco.com> <CAO42Z2zq0chKx08d10JBNkpa5e8J4MWAJWk+2Qs1DD7y_wkYUw@mail.gmail.com> <05981e2ea71c4b3083ed6e15c7e20641@huawei.com> <CAO42Z2wzk7W4_gy6j+sW=1z+xoyMMxsjnUbZkaf=jcG0zZqddg@mail.gmail.com> <A286098D-1EEA-4CBC-9AF4-9B2054D6F2C7@cisco.com> <c6f9a05d-5ba5-1b97-d1be-ead911610521@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <c6f9a05d-5ba5-1b97-d1be-ead911610521@gont.com.ar>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.22.0.200209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.28.92.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <920E47D291E65846A660BC5C95EEFE42@exchange.bell.ca>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/a1qF-hwXRd69y2w74J49o31vhzU>
Subject: Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 02:04:16 -0000

Ridiculous ..  any NOS coder, coding IPv6, would have awareness of 2460, why would you even go there .. seriously ?

The highlight was for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-26#page-4 - you should probl read it all.

I think we've reach the limit of what the "IETF email" can offer for such debate. We should probably have a call or meet at 107.

While reading the "longer explanation", don't forget to lookup the reply here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rtMom05r7_pLq1zN2lf16_B58mE/

dan

On 2020-02-27, 5:11 PM, "spring on behalf of Fernando Gont" <spring-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of fernando@gont.com.ar> wrote:

    On 27/2/20 18:11, Darren Dukes (ddukes) wrote:
    > Mark AH is not defined for SRH.  There is no specification to ignore.
    
    Do you realize that you are using IPv6, and that AH is specified for IPv6?
    
    Is the AD watching? -- Seriously, this is going through a very curious 
    and dangerous path.
    
    For the interested reader, a longer explanation of the issue:
    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sbb95BqdPifuRb_NPc3aeiqBbfM/
    
    Thanks,
    -- 
    Fernando Gont
    e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
    PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    spring mailing list
    spring@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    External Email: Please use caution when opening links and attachments / Courriel externe: Soyez prudent avec les liens et documents joints

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email