Re: [spring] SRv6 SID List compression

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Tue, 27 July 2021 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636303A109E for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VSeB8j-0AEKd for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2777D3A109B for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id ds11-20020a17090b08cbb0290172f971883bso1883595pjb.1 for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:03:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=K1g/jhemPFlI1beALAK3yonThEOK4Y3iQEsTyIcCc9w=; b=BPrTiVos7lzbZKJKsEAnwwn9eS9gZNFJy0eGZaPdUyjFsobTI6ngAgcu161lCJTfx2 GC4cmVmhq6QU2cu/28jFEqqee0S3RH8AOhABtFVIpW/hSl1PQym8N4thApc/5vUxe52r 2fHUhN64TL/hqU5+LhgOL1gpjU95IY0UFVzMtTJqe59pXD9sJIqoCCAPXaIVncN8Dexy QFIHPJ1xmHzyVaI0rzoiwBzjZbypcNYUKqBORUDQFVhFgx4lU0Co8PC0yUE8HhvzVM6e FbOivzjwe2wtGkKXB16sPewGP68hPE8GDbB0qffA+LMBervofEiqdJdQi8BEDYvF9aBd Wazg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K1g/jhemPFlI1beALAK3yonThEOK4Y3iQEsTyIcCc9w=; b=PjIEPGlWnSzQ2ow9HzbSa/UVjzf2rEZjY2EF+TA25JT6UDb/JEDx/r0b9X+8Py6UmC Wr02e6HimJCF4Cx74xomGHa4g4lmn1vigtsg1Bg1+2WFNQyAIbpqGhIUfLR72PA0CT5B TCJVBbITbQxQFrgAXkxhk0g0dxN6qg3AmEQBSoDA3HKgFxuKbPrYXrZagIQPV3DkaYgS 0qJ9NDSigrJ9sli/rSWuDyvfIaK43rA2t9lU1eJ69QDQCgAoxTA3aEvMHj/XoeWznb7Y GlRtkTy6P/kb5lw2ilqP1ZO00xaqBNwU7olI10d+bNSCwpLLe9wSNL9XeTdVX1p3PRW9 o3gQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ORXtAgk4QFS+hV39vH9om7FZVNhqwNjBPtdLoqUgtYfWjGUM2 rSMJMVNRbfgdy+gGA70vP6CprT9PBfrQavpCDU8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxk0UmgWEUs4KMv0m2uNSOPCLY9T6dCu2cjf/UAnZTflQLitsMBiAwWIqDfcybJ9fc4eeITEQl66f4FTMqSUYw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:180e:b029:39e:4765:20c4 with SMTP id y14-20020a056a00180eb029039e476520c4mr3664464pfa.30.1627351407822; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN6PR11MB40817B5D7BDE6A15735F3A92C8E89@BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CABNhwV3r=1x2NtMx1K8Cwxwo02CXNVibePpMdnisx3oa_Vz87Q@mail.gmail.com> <BL0PR05MB5316C71B40CC0AC2D98AF793AEE99@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR05MB5316C71B40CC0AC2D98AF793AEE99@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 22:03:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV2iJRFyv0_AVE7TXPm30zox4nm=PRRp+jAmJfgD-OLQBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000968c8505c8114628"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/bXECuKM05IQuv7P0aLS-Zh9gr7A>
Subject: Re: [spring] SRv6 SID List compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 02:03:44 -0000

Hi Ron

That is a very crucial point that the DT was chartered to provide input
data to the WG.

Many thanks for the clarifications for me as well as maybe others in the WG
from today’s  DT update.

I am in sync and fully agree with the tasks you have laid out.

Responses in-line

Kind Regards

Gyan

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 9:15 PM Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:

> Gyan,
>
>
>
> The design team was not chartered to select a winner. It was chartered to
> provide input to the WG.
>
>
>
> AFAIKS, the WG still has the following tasks before it:
>
>
>
>    - To determine whether the all candidate solutions are compliant with
>    existing BCP and PS drafts (particularly RFC 4291)
>    - To determine whether zero, one, or more candidate solutions should
>    be advanced
>    - To determine which requirements are significant with regard to
>    candidate advancement
>
>  Gyan> Agreed.  Maybe an assignment of a weight or priorities to the
> requirements.
>
> Recall that the DT did not poll operators for requirements.
>
Gyan> Yes

> They documented requirements as they understood them.
>
Gyan> Understood

> Therefore, requirements may be skewed, reflecting the composition of the
> design team more than the requirements of the larger community.
>

Gyan> Understood

> Note: 5 of 7 design team members were co-authors of the CSID, GSID, or
> uSID documents.
>

Gyan> Understood

>
>                                                                                                                             Ron
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Gyan Mishra
> *Sent:* Monday, July 26, 2021 7:51 PM
> *To:* Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Cc:* SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [spring] SRv6 SID List compression
>
>
>
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear DT,
>
>
>
> Excellent work and many thanks to  the design team to come provide the
> detailed analysis of the 4 proposals and how they match up with the
> requirements.
>
>
>
> From the analysis it does sound like CSID is the choice by the DT.
>
>
>
> SRv6 compression & MSD issue is now finally solved!  Excellent news!!
>
>
>
> Now it’s just a matter of moving forward with CSID Adoption poll.
>
>
>
> From the analysis it does not seem there is any draft that is in close 2nd
> place or a close call.
>
>
>
> From the analysis draft the two drafts that are combined to create CSID ->
> I don’t see it on the Spring WG Datatracker?
>
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-02
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-02__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!T1m9_LZEbJp1PWQS-L6mAGJcAAdumuRNTNGPJaeW0ztTzRRY4AXbPC5rj2yTHP0N$>
>
>
>
> The following mechanisms are proposed to compress the SRv6 SID list:
>
>
>
>    o  CSID - [I-D.filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-comp-sl-enc <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-02*ref-I-D.filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-comp-sl-enc__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!T1m9_LZEbJp1PWQS-L6mAGJcAAdumuRNTNGPJaeW0ztTzRRY4AXbPC5rjxe7S708$>] - Describes
>
>       two new SRv6 SID flavors, a combination of SID flavors from
>
>       [I-D.filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-02*ref-I-D.filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!T1m9_LZEbJp1PWQS-L6mAGJcAAdumuRNTNGPJaeW0ztTzRRY4AXbPC5rj2yEaZI-$>] and
>
>       [I-D.cl-spring-generalized-srv6-for-cmpr <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-02*ref-I-D.cl-spring-generalized-srv6-for-cmpr__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!T1m9_LZEbJp1PWQS-L6mAGJcAAdumuRNTNGPJaeW0ztTzRRY4AXbPC5rj_ClpaL9$>]
>
>    o  CRH - [I-D.bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-02*ref-I-D.bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!T1m9_LZEbJp1PWQS-L6mAGJcAAdumuRNTNGPJaeW0ztTzRRY4AXbPC5rj-KHFlCz$>] - Requires two new routing
>
>       header types and a label mapping technique.
>
>    o  VSID - [I-D.decraene-spring-srv6-vlsid <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-02*ref-I-D.decraene-spring-srv6-vlsid__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!T1m9_LZEbJp1PWQS-L6mAGJcAAdumuRNTNGPJaeW0ztTzRRY4AXbPC5rj2CTgfb0$>] - Defines a set of SID
>
>       behaviors to access smaller SIDs within the SR header.
>
>    o  UIDSR - [I-D.mirsky-6man-unified-id-sr <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-02*ref-I-D.mirsky-6man-unified-id-sr__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!T1m9_LZEbJp1PWQS-L6mAGJcAAdumuRNTNGPJaeW0ztTzRRY4AXbPC5rj9m08qUr$>] - Extends the SRH to carry
>
>       MPLS labels or IPv6 addresses.
>
>
>
>
>
> Below 2 drafts are combined to create CSID??
>
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid-10
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid-10__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!T1m9_LZEbJp1PWQS-L6mAGJcAAdumuRNTNGPJaeW0ztTzRRY4AXbPC5rj5MZ6N5p$>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-for-cmpr-03
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-for-cmpr-03__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!T1m9_LZEbJp1PWQS-L6mAGJcAAdumuRNTNGPJaeW0ztTzRRY4AXbPC5rj6gvuXDE$>
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
>
>
> Gyan
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 5:53 PM Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes=
> 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> I’ll paraphrase what I said in the call...
>
>
>
> Today the design team presented analysis of proposals to compress an SRv6
> SID list.
>
> They spent a year building the requirements and completing the analysis,
> in depth, with unanimous consensus.
>
> The CSID proposal satisfied all the requirements to the largest degree of
> any proposal.
>
> That proposal has multiple implementations, and interoperability, noted in
> the draft.
>
> That proposal has a large set of SPRING participants working on it already.
>
>
>
> The problem of SRv6 SID list compression is solved, CSID is ready for
> adoption.
>
>
>
> I hope we can conclude this, and choose a single proposal for WG adoption.
>
>
>
> Darren
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!T1m9_LZEbJp1PWQS-L6mAGJcAAdumuRNTNGPJaeW0ztTzRRY4AXbPC5rj5zQiccg$>
>
> --
>
>
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.verizon.com/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!T1m9_LZEbJp1PWQS-L6mAGJcAAdumuRNTNGPJaeW0ztTzRRY4AXbPC5rjwQFrDmj$>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions Architect *
>
> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
>
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*