[spring] Re: Request for MORE reviews of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-09

"wanghaojie@chinamobile.com" <wanghaojie@chinamobile.com> Fri, 06 September 2024 09:55 UTC

Return-Path: <wanghaojie@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78DFC169409; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 02:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id el1YUV68WLwv; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 02:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A836EC151520; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 02:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee766dad16b446-f844c; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 17:54:54 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee766dad16b446-f844c
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmri-HUAWEIQINGYUNL420 (unknown[10.2.51.92]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee766dad16c1b0-a2b99; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 17:54:54 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee766dad16c1b0-a2b99
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 17:54:53 +0800
From: "wanghaojie@chinamobile.com" <wanghaojie@chinamobile.com>
To: Cheng Li <c.l=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
References: <9c01f395dd634cab8ef00fee7af877db@huawei.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: F3542210-ADE0-4D4E-AB07-F5FCC55EE396
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.306[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2024090617545283646410@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart535104808345_=----"
Message-ID-Hash: HJIQD475BMVP3Z3N4FY4MY7TQA4MIF67
X-Message-ID-Hash: HJIQD475BMVP3Z3N4FY4MY7TQA4MIF67
X-MailFrom: wanghaojie@chinamobile.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spring.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [spring] Re: Request for MORE reviews of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-09
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG (SPRING)" <spring.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/bmCnnxA3zp6QcjA1Lk6fhfOsRB0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spring-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spring-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spring-leave@ietf.org>

Hi WG,
        I have reviewed this draft. It provides a method for the application such as bidirectional tunnel binding, network performance measurement and so on. I think it's mature and completed. Hope it could be moved forward quickly. Thanks.



Best regards,
Haojie Wang
China Mobile Research Institute
Department of Fundamental Network Technology
wanghaojie@chinamobile.com 
 
From: Cheng Li
Date: 2024-09-02 23:45
To: spring@ietf.org
CC: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Request for MORE reviews of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-09
Hi SPRING,
 
The SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has been published as RFC9545, and we think the content of SRv6 Path Segment draft is quite stable and mature, so we hope to see more tech reviews on it so that we can move the draft forward.
 
The draft is quite simple and straightforward, and it defines a new type of segment called Path Segment, which is useful to identify an SRv6 path, similar to SR-MPLS path segment. 
The draft only defines the location that the SRv6 Path Segment should appear, the possible general formats of it, and the general handling of Path Segment. How to allocate the value to a Path Segment is out of the scope of this draft and should be defined as per use cases.
An SRv6 Path Segment will not be used for routing so it should not be copied to the IPv6 destination address.
 
Many thanks for Adrian, Stefano and Zafar for their useful comments and help on this draft. More reviews and comments are welcome!
 
Thanks,
Cheng
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> 
Sent: Monday, September 2, 2024 5:15 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-09.txt
 
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-09.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) WG of the IETF.
 
   Title:   Path Segment for SRv6 (Segment Routing in IPv6)
   Authors: Cheng Li
            Weiqiang Cheng
            Mach(Guoyi) Chen
            Dhruv Dhody
            Yongqing Zhu
   Name:    draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-09.txt
   Pages:   13
   Dates:   2024-09-02
 
Abstract:
 
   Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end
   paths by encoding an ordered list of instructions, called "segments".
   The SR architecture can be implemented over an MPLS data plane as
   well as an IPv6 data plane.
 
   Currently, Path Segment has been defined to identify an SR path in
   SR-MPLS networks, and is used for various use-cases such as end-to-
   end SR Path Protection and Performance Measurement (PM) of an SR
   path.  This document defines the Path Segment to identify an SRv6
   path in an IPv6 network.
 
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment/
 
There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-09
 
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-09
 
Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
 
 
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to spring-leave@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to spring-leave@ietf.org