[spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security (ends Aug/19)

song.xueyan2@zte.com.cn Fri, 09 August 2024 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <song.xueyan2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF6FC18DB94; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 01:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MR3aqkzZ9Q6g; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 01:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FD08C1840D8; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 01:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4WgHqH2GDMz4xthK; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 16:57:31 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app05.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.121]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 4798tvNc011892; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 16:56:25 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from song.xueyan2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njb2app07[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 16:56:28 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 16:56:28 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2aff66b5d9bc504-44a24
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20240809165628045lRLPTYdyRxt9R8N0SolLx@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsyA1iPN7b1RhgW6ajFcG6m0f07Q072jxQn3q2729W3xzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: CAMMESsyA1iPN7b1RhgW6ajFcG6m0f07Q072jxQn3q2729W3xzw@mail.gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: song.xueyan2@zte.com.cn
To: aretana.ietf@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 4798tvNc011892
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 66B5D9FB.002/4WgHqH2GDMz4xthK
Message-ID-Hash: E3UFBC7J5F2LKWY3YFHHWSQHO7PKVDME
X-Message-ID-Hash: E3UFBC7J5F2LKWY3YFHHWSQHO7PKVDME
X-MailFrom: song.xueyan2@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spring.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: spring@ietf.org, draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security (ends Aug/19)
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG (SPRING)" <spring.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/cGrFIzuDjJaVbSdrQ10ApZD0ZY4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spring-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spring-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spring-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Chairs,

I reviewed the draft and consider it provides some necessary SRv6 security considerations. It seems to be a good start for the draft to be processed as WG draft.

Best regards,
Xueyan





Original


From: AlvaroRetana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>;
Cc: draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security@ietf.org <draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security@ietf.org>;spring-chairs@ietf.org <spring-chairs@ietf.org>;
Date: 2024年08月05日 21:05
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security (ends Aug/19)


Dear WG:
 
This message starts a two-week adoption call for
ddraft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security, ending on August/19. From the
Abstract:
 
   This document discusses security considerations in SRv6 networks,
   including the potential threats and the possible mitigation methods.
   The document does not define any new security protocols or extensions
   to existing protocols.
 
 
   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security/
 
 
Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption
by the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support
or opposition -- this is not a vote.
 
If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it
explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the
working group willing to work on the document.
 
WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is
whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and
whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are
particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not
authors of the document.
 
Note that the IESG requested that the WG deliver a document covering
security considerations for SRv6. This document is intended to satisfy
that request.
 
Thanks!
 
Alvaro (for the Chairs)
 
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to spring-leave@ietf.org