Re: [spring] packet captures for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06?

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 18/12/2019 à 21:59, Andrew Alston a écrit :
>>     > /RP/0/RP0/CPU0:SRV6-R2#show segment-routing srv6 locator R2 sid Sun Dec
>>     > 15 04:56:10.913 UTC/
>>     >
>>     > /SID                         Behavior
>>     > Context                           Owner               State  RW/
>>     >
>>     > /--------------------------  -----------
>>     > ------------------------------    ------------------  -----  --/
>>     >
>>     > /2001:db8:ee:2:1::           End (PSP)
>>     > 'default':1                       sidmgr              InUse  Y/
>      
>>     I would like to ask you whether that
>>     2001:db8:ee:2:1::
>>     could rather be
>>     2001:db8:ee:ff:2:1::?
>      
> Just to clarify to y last email - in the above - 2001:db8:ee:2 is the
> locator - 1 seems to be a function - which I also realize does not
> align at all with section 9.2 of the draft - but am I correct in
> understanding you are asking if the locator could be
> 2001:db8:ee:ff:2:: - with 1 being the function - in which case the
> answer, as per my previous email, is no - not in the code bases I am
> testing on.

Thank you for the reply.

If the locator can only be 64bit in length then I think it is wrong.

But I am aware the more I say that the stronger and more numerous the 
RFCs using a fixed 64 are published :-)  It is not what I want.  So I 
stop saying it.

Alex

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Andrew
> 
>