IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Comments on <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-01>

"Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com> Wed, 10 July 2019 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <pcamaril@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B631200DE for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Y+Cohytb; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=X5yv2161
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQxW0FN9VR1I for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD92612010C for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17645; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1562765096; x=1563974696; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=TNhSZiEUKlgdaWkIzYJ7ab2danA8DdHR2LEn7PMeMpo=; b=Y+CohytbS4d87WBS4/zC2Moanv2eKi2k4E6CYqBY7CFA03ZHsaLKg4uN fnUmfsZh2HHv6nNIoJTyvmtpCQ2ExVEF/4bsrUja3FOhPmfPsURV2SZU5 mIBSQbZGq9ulBJYj9TZZ7rfXSjDQ6Qi0ORnqpXAPYRUkQNe+UyB+D26Ed Q=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:9wleRBT5o4T+zo4qwfhEtyItoNpsv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBNfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH15g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOjQxFcFLTl5h13q6KkNSXs35Yg6arw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BZAADv5SVd/5RdJa1lHAEBAQQBAQcEAQGBUwcBAQsBgRQvUANqVSAECyiEHINHA4RSiXWCNiWSdIRUgS6BJANUCQEBAQwBAS0CAQGEQBmCNyM0CQ4BAwEBBAEBAgEFbYU8DIVKAQIBAxIRHQEBNwERAQgRAwECKwIEMB0KBAENBSKDAAGBHU0DHQECow4CgTiIYHGBMoJ5AQEFhQYYghIJgTQBi14XgUA/gREnDBOCTD6EZIJqMoImjnKEfYhpjgIJAoIZlAYbgiyHIY4zjTCXPwIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUDiBWHAVZQGCQYJBg3GKU3KBKY49AQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,474,1557187200"; d="scan'208,217";a="596168659"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 10 Jul 2019 13:24:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6ADOsmN030228 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:24:54 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:24:54 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 09:24:53 -0400
Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:24:52 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=TNhSZiEUKlgdaWkIzYJ7ab2danA8DdHR2LEn7PMeMpo=; b=X5yv2161VL8q1a8s+lscj2jNwklTHYSzqeYtRKIHON86ISj1vBkQCq8d8xi12dVZNlQLAv/i4aX/r1eupq7O2vs/dx7uyxN4ND/JcmzPtjXMRWPMekrd4k+28tX51nom0K9XddjSHLOz/mxT19HlKGZmsJXhLYRSt9wV6mWDga0=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.150.80) by MN2PR11MB4158.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.150.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2052.18; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:24:51 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a0f2:f335:804a:8756]) by MN2PR11MB4094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a0f2:f335:804a:8756%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2052.020; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:24:51 +0000
From: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
To: Xiejingrong <xiejingrong@huawei.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com>
CC: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Comments on <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-01>
Thread-Index: AQHVNyKpNDbOZlha7026MkP1gcL90A==
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:24:51 +0000
Message-ID: <5D7DDF63-855F-4596-A752-106BCD7DB63C@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pcamaril@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:4487:1300:bd9d:b171:ec82:2e41]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1b6efc8e-8c23-4460-86d6-08d70539fd4a
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB4158;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4158:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4158A85F1A4A551A4BFA18D4C9F00@MN2PR11MB4158.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0094E3478A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(366004)(396003)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(6116002)(2906002)(7736002)(53936002)(316002)(14454004)(110136005)(256004)(81166006)(8676002)(66556008)(66446008)(71190400001)(86362001)(99286004)(71200400001)(64756008)(66946007)(66476007)(91956017)(76116006)(5660300002)(8936002)(53546011)(81156014)(486006)(25786009)(186003)(6486002)(46003)(478600001)(6436002)(33656002)(229853002)(68736007)(6306002)(6512007)(54896002)(36756003)(476003)(6246003)(4326008)(6506007)(2616005)(102836004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4158; H:MN2PR11MB4094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 5v6cEBkQYxKMadKnPkI/BWdswtAvTvJmRZgh90Z/d7B9k6URGAupdha+POD54bEHp3kytPl3vwpJbnBhpzPaB58IC0350FgABstK2EuzdWMqFuJWj8DzUFpkxBVEy7qYH+nD3UwcglGeAse4kX/nV/H1K0HpOKXJJ2WtPM1FaKOhJrIzkD3VT/iLjEH7Fh05zYQhXQgKfXQQ/CedGSdy/Ot4U6xqKneyAmpVRDfO6u4X4KwMF4pinhewyVvFmbj3SpL2pvcrCxIb8Zhm1I87MCEc7kBW8gK+MvHkbqltcbwYDWGtAeBQYKyYbylGn8QVxrS7pM0fRQY6lFLSHvCkdfRlmioDY+S+TD6Y5ALovdySG3CZwyiYtRTebQhhR9vSvuDhFGElWWayB0tLIs/3UwnugtmrrBA8thtjSkHeRxQ=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5D7DDF63855F4596A752106BCD7DB63Cciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1b6efc8e-8c23-4460-86d6-08d70539fd4a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Jul 2019 13:24:51.4930 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: pcamaril@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4158
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/dcB2m9e2iYn4hxHOsPh2-wT_ya8>
Subject: Re: [spring] Comments on <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-01>
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:25:00 -0000

Hi Jingrong,

The behaviours numbers are not hold privately: they are hold by the working group until the RFC is published and therefore the new IANA registry is created. After that, the registry is maintained by IANA with the registration procedure described in the draft.

If the paragraph in the draft is not clear, please feel free to propose a new one.

Note that Loa and Shuping particularly asked to clarify this. In Prague I met with them and we updated the following:

  *   SRv6 Endpoint Behavior sub-registry; second range: Changed registration procedure from “IETF Review” to “Specification required”
  *   Added paragraph clarifying who is maintaining the initial entries until the registry is created by IANA

Regards,
Pablo.

From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Xiejingrong <xiejingrong@huawei.com>
Date: Wednesday, 10 July 2019 at 05:55
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] Comments on <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-01>

But one point I am even more confused:
   The SRv6 Endpoint Behavior numbers are maintained by the working
   group until the RFC is published.  Note to the RFC Editor: Remove
   this paragraph before publication.

Why does this document say to create a new registry, but hold the Behavior numbers privately ?
We need the IANA registry be created and allocation from the registry.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email