[spring] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10.txt

Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com> Mon, 09 September 2024 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4888DC1516E2 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 10:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0IVDFbTYnXgU for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 10:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40D23C15154D for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 10:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4X2YJR2FzRz6L74g; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 01:11:03 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500004.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.22]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6AA41404F9; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 01:14:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.28) by frapeml500004.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 19:14:37 +0200
Received: from frapeml500003.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.28]) by frapeml500003.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.28]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.039; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 19:14:37 +0200
From: Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com>
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "bruno.decraene@orange.com" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, "zehua.hu@foxmail.com" <zehua.hu@foxmail.com>, "liu.yao71@zte.com.cn" <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn>, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Thread-Topic: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10.txt
Thread-Index: AQHbAtlqLFXGKJnEx020KDJ700prpLJPrTCQ
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 17:14:37 +0000
Message-ID: <e6f8f704337b4617a3d72d31f18c8949@huawei.com>
References: <172590095623.2720556.1662029191530075804@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp>
In-Reply-To: <172590095623.2720556.1662029191530075804@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.203.70.229]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: NBJW4AV44ZWH6VCLF3JNTHSRP6P47PFU
X-Message-ID-Hash: NBJW4AV44ZWH6VCLF3JNTHSRP6P47PFU
X-MailFrom: c.l@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spring.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [spring] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10.txt
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG (SPRING)" <spring.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/es68Q80N4U3YmLFf9AFdmjkDRGU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spring-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spring-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spring-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Bruno, Zehua, Yao, Joel, Adrian,

We have updated the draft according to your valuable comments recently. Please check if your comments are addressed.

1. added IANA section of P-flag and removed P-flag in the figure 3. [Bruno: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/GF-l7Njzt9GzuYgjDN7Xmkqw_uw/]
2. added text to explain how to handle the P-flag and intermediate node processing. Confirmed by Zehua already. [Zehua: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/f6teRgYMt1pv-ZtKqjh49WZw1aI/]
3. added text in introduction to explain the usage of Path Segment in different SR policy. [Yao: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/jzoWkPc7VlhfJeKfzI8zW_jI194/]
4. added terms of SR path and SRv6 path, added text in Section 3 to explain the usage of SRv6 Path Segment to address Joel's comments.[Joel: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/9DaRZ16Lhdvr-w8Z_BMTDF8Y8gw/]
5. added text in Security section.
6. made arguments are 0 instead of optional. In SRv6, the SID should define its argument clearly, with argument or without. We choose to remain the argument part but make it as 0 for now, which makes the implementation clear and easy.
7. updated to IANA code point 100 for END.PSID.
8. Other editorial modification. Please see diffs.

Thank you so much for your comments! BTW, thanks for Lijie, Shengnan, Haojie's support, and Greg's comments.

Respect,
Cheng



-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> 
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2024 6:56 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) WG of the IETF.

   Title:   Path Segment for SRv6 (Segment Routing in IPv6)
   Authors: Cheng Li
            Weiqiang Cheng
            Mach(Guoyi) Chen
            Dhruv Dhody
            Yongqing Zhu
   Name:    draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10.txt
   Pages:   15
   Dates:   2024-09-09

Abstract:

   Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end
   paths by encoding an ordered list of instructions, called "segments".
   The SR architecture can be implemented over an MPLS data plane as
   well as an IPv6 data plane.

   Currently, Path Segment has been defined to identify an SR path in
   SR-MPLS networks, and is used for various use-cases such as end-to-
   end SR Path Protection and Performance Measurement (PM) of an SR
   path.  This document defines the Path Segment to identify an SRv6
   path in an IPv6 network.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment/

There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to spring-leave@ietf.org