IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Dispute process (Was: Resignation request)

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 11 March 2020 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B63B3A0BF4; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rbJ3A1a5eEoj; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brown.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (brown.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB553A0B63; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96765023B9; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:57:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a66.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-215-21.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.215.21]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1AD4C50239A; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:57:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a66.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.5); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:57:29 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Turn-Trail: 0fd9f4380a3140ca_1583960249438_2093615
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1583960249437:3898298461
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1583960249436
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a66.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a66.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C03B7EFD4; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=6CaZMsPFCgEB+e LkMrL4VAnmX18=; b=cfKGjpK1sVW9e69U3A/ENXpJd5qeQu1ApxEM4pajbwwAnz wwubz+ow5CamvV35B/DxP7GrxvVfeUPqylQD41FSbevC+QLJ7upsQNEN9GGc4a4W YcqpkLmFgRcH8WDIch6bvy49L0yLisrgqHxVWEWIHAtZLlIigGpI+R2r6cxu8=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a66.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 801617EFE0; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:57:19 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a66
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Alex Bogdanov <bogdanov=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200311205718.GE18021@localhost>
References: <20200310184518.GY18021@localhost> <EB49F5CB-1FD1-4FB1-867B-886233E33B38@nohats.ca> <20200310233442.GZ18021@localhost> <0D0D273B-345D-457D-B2B9-9B43C780191A@episteme.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0D0D273B-345D-457D-B2B9-9B43C780191A@episteme.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddvfedgvdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhm
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/gGg26B5FHn9ttbbpSUjCPZHQ7Uo>
Subject: Re: [spring] Dispute process (Was: Resignation request)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:57:32 -0000

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:26:35PM -0500, Pete Resnick wrote:
> On 10 Mar 2020, at 18:34, Nico Williams wrote:
> > (A cynic might wonder if that choice was not purposeful, precisely to
> > allow the original work to continue unimpeded [perhaps] on the ISE track
> > with an appeal mooted.  I do not believe that was the case.)
> 
> As Paul alluded to, it all assume that the ISE accepts the documents. If
> not, more fun may occur.

There was agreement that the WG would not oppose the two parties'
submissions to the ISE on the topic.

> > I wouldn't want to drag the ombudsman into this, but maybe that's the
> > next best step.
> 
> I would refer you to RFC 7776. I don't think this would be in the
> ombudsteam's purview. (Not trying to get out of work, really!)

I was suggesting updating that, not acting as though we already have :)

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email