IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]

"Weiqiang Cheng" <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Fri, 18 October 2019 03:42 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601321201CE; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 20:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uC0zC-r-1b0f; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 20:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B806A120044; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 20:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.1]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee45da934a31e3-c8439; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:42:27 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee45da934a31e3-c8439
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc (unknown[10.2.51.55]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee15da934a1bae-c9586; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:42:27 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee15da934a1bae-c9586
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: spring@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
References: <00f901d582ba$f474a230$dd5de690$@ndzh.com> <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02747F15@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02747F15@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:42:27 +0800
Message-ID: <019501d58566$1004b500$300e1f00$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0196_01D585A9.1E27F500"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdWCuk3YU0jOn/ygQ1+t1TuQqTQ3YAAfjXAgAIsdUAAAADj0AA==
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/ge-OCGnTHij19XgXFBg_dpAk7xA>
Subject: Re: [spring] [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:42:49 -0000

Support the adoption.

 

B.R.

Weiqiang Cheng

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 2:13 AM
To: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>; 'SPRING WG List' <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption:
draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and
draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to
10/21/2019]

 

Greetings IDR and Spring WG

 

The WG Adoption for the two IDR drafts related to IDR received a level
support below the threshold to accept this draft into the IDR WG.  There
were no objection, but there was simply a low level of response. 

 

This 1 week extension to the Adoption call is to let the members of both the
IDR and SPRING WG comment on whether these drafts have matured enough to be
IDR WG drafts.  On 10/21/2019, the IDR chairs will make a determination of
whether either of these two drafts have enough support to be accepted. 

 

Thank you,  Susan  Hares

IDR co-chair 

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 12:35 PM
To: 'idr wg'
Subject: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt
and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019]

 

This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call two related drafts [9/17 to 10/1/2019]


!$         draft-li-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and 

!$         draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt. 

 

You can access these two drafts at the following location: 

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment/

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment/

 

The authors have pointed out that the adoption of this 

draft since the following  SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has been adopted: 

 

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00

 

Please consider the following questions in your responses? 

 

1)      Should this SR Policy technology be included in BGP for SR-MPLS 

 

Spring has adopted the draft, but IDR can provide feedback 

to spring about putting this technology in BGP.

 

2)      Is this technology a good way to implement the required 

Features in BGP? 

 

3)      Is this technology ready for adoption? 

 

4)      Do you have any concerns about adopting this technology? 

 

 

Cheers, Susan Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email