Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Wed, 26 February 2020 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1A03A0863; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:45:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9nZPfx5B-7tL; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:45:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7203A087C; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:45:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7828286B7F; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:45:21 +0100 (CET)
To: bruno.decraene@orange.com, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
Cc: 'SPRING WG List' <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
References: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D9364A1C2@DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <4038_1582727829_5E568295_4038_168_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DB381A@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Message-ID: <8ca30058-b8cf-cba4-524d-99b34e2b01d6@gont.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:45:14 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4038_1582727829_5E568295_4038_168_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DB381A@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/iCQCUmD-CjyLi4nEGaTGkIiXoc8>
Subject: Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:45:30 -0000

On 26/2/20 11:37, bruno.decraene@orange.com wrote:
> Hi Robin,
> 
> I think that this was expected that this specific LC would last for more 
> than 2 weeks.
> 
> Summarizing and closing it is on my to do list. (I wish my to do list 
> were smaller, or that I throw more $$ or contributors on action items. 
> But wishing does not help much in my world.)
> 
> That been said, this does not change much with regards to technical 
> comments been raised:
> 
> -They are either addressed, non-addressed or pending
> 
> -they can be raised after the WG LC (e.g. during IETF LC or IESG review)
> 
> -they can even be raised after RFC publication. And eventually can led 
> to errata, bis document, deprecation…

So... is the plan to ship a document that violates RFC8200?

Should participants stop wasting time in constructive comments, and 
rather work and prepare to submit a formal appeal, instead?

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1