IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-06

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 21 December 2017 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F84112D886; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:19:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NEa5wD8TQc6t; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x244.google.com (mail-ot0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C824126C19; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x244.google.com with SMTP id v21so22713689oth.6; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:19:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=alylnycJZWftHjRrmy9W6flTRt7yhC8fRu4cSg6fMVg=; b=ASwG8jbATwQJH6+F0cPHxkhOnucPcsZellVI1sViZEIExs7B9sP67o/WiuVQIilFdF OWm1h1Prk1TrBPMR+UrCUIaD6GeRTlSD4LocpHwMGgKirsVOPmCUtl4pmRFvjzgDDe2U rK32aYRgBFtN3QBAv0lxFhpFNDoA1V1GkPpJkWgmH8Ex1tRyf1zKQRpACJWdXFPxs70i wYppnTZpSEjDbiT5mshbvKEw1fVR+wyhXeUTKMae/MBvsJcxVkkWf/Htstj/WXyUOOD/ U4DDN6Pew2FQv2c3YY+6tyg88RbnNdH2grnEbC09krmiYDdaSQXB6TAJmeaG8nKqcU4g hNbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=alylnycJZWftHjRrmy9W6flTRt7yhC8fRu4cSg6fMVg=; b=F2xLusAuBVVugOeKCZyCJqHpzD+X4QBTkR6MznCTA//6BR7lsCLaah8vnKJxnZxzPC Da+wwKw3OOKz9WEbT+e/UZ7rgEpbsCZaI4e3Y95pjPhwx/FO65X91MaZogqgRtSCWbtV SS5+KjhjMRt0lfHdjgiRJTGN+s3Qvmj1R6EboirmHsCZuvcjl24Ytx6ESp9MbFWM1qXN nakrqzMV5xz/lQtKxqp4l10h/QnEve8cg+bvoR2JIW3+QiGRqTzhrMiIWjWiARZc18iL nKy88+yMWJKukayEx/w1/MKjm1RLhHcirP3zIt4ldyzpEdMsiBMVSNxVq0zHskwC33BC 5tLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJGEHLEtrppoSHSESrK68I1d8DGbIygDVB/WIyZOeRAvBgfy0mG 0eZdoydowFVbqcYHIUqi47vSaZatcFsLqKfxqAE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoudhvyi+1KuuCf3AY53Z7b70McTyYcccxGYozUaTRo9zR4wsMseUKXWTsoCVRJvXeSLFOXOapC11L3JcgSlxHM=
X-Received: by 10.157.60.51 with SMTP id q48mr8040790otc.164.1513869588776; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:19:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:19:48 -0500
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <27769_1513867189_5A3BC7B5_27769_440_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A47929B47@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <998FE834-F9C6-43F2-8D10-30EE14CCECB6@cisco.com> <114895D1-093E-4D91-873B-0F64E9EE9EA0@cisco.com> <A5D28916-75B0-4A6F-87D5-370E1C53D6A7@cisco.com> <CAMMESswbBtH8Pd3mEz7pW2GWGS0CW=ZB3FgZAc3Y_TsPsFhAXw@mail.gmail.com> <AC082436-EA2E-4C1C-9826-2E3EA89CFB2D@cisco.com> <19921_1513854380_5A3B95AC_19921_269_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A47929463@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <73AE44FA-B557-4F1B-9FAD-59AB8946C13F@cisco.com> <16374_1513866122_5A3BC38A_16374_164_5_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A47929A34@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <27769_1513867189_5A3BC7B5_27769_440_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A47929B47@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
X-Mailer: Airmail (467)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:19:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxFBfDH1p0Tgh4_pA0Z4r2gimycxeBm3V8ueB3Xvar3gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Gaurav Dawra (gdawra)" <gdawra@cisco.com>, bruno.decraene@orange.com
Cc: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe@Ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c022f0134cb20560db3b96"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/jU6PyVrOe5gFSd89Mf0FawIzdPE>
Subject: Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-06
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:19:52 -0000

On December 21, 2017 at 9:39:49 AM, bruno.decraene@orange.com (
bruno.decraene@orange.com) wrote:

I see that you have also added the “note” on for the VPN routes. I don’t
think it’s necessary here as:

- if both routes are VPN ones, they are both labelled and are comparable as
per regular BGP/MPLS IP VPN routes

- if only the “policy” route is installed in the VRF (VRF fallback to the
main FIB), only the labeled VPN routes is considered, hence preferred.



Bottom line, I think that the note can be removed in the VPN section (5.4).
But nothing urgent, this can wait for a next update.

Hi!

I’m waiting for that next update to approve publication…

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email