Re: [spring] WG Adoption call - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis

["Chengli (Cheng Li)" <[e-mail]>]

As an co-author, I support the adoption of the documents since they have been discussed deeply.

I will suggest to move the requirements to be published as an RFC, since the requirements are not solution related. But I do not suggest to move the analysis documents to be published as an RFC, since it may depended on all the solutions to be standardized. But anyway, it is an another story.

Clearly, I am willing to work on these two documents.

Many thanks for the contributions from anyone!

Respect,
Cheng



From: spring [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of [e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 9:13 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis

Dear WG,


The Design Team has produced two documents:
- A requirement document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement
- A solution analysis document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis

Both have been presented to the WG and triggered some discussions but are still individual documents.
We believe it's now time for the WG to consider taking ownership of those two documents.
Note that, especially for those two documents, WG adoption does not necessarily mean RFC publication in particular if it turns out that the benefit of long term archive would not justify the WG and IESG effort to finalize those two documents.


This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call, ending September  20th 2021, for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis


After review of the document(s) please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption of the document(s) to the mailing list.
Please also provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack thereof) as this is a stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is not a vote.

If you are willing to work on the document(s), please state this explicitly. This gives the chairs an indication of the energy level of people in the working group willing to work on the document.

Thanks!

Jim, Bruno & Joel


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.