Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Thu, 27 February 2020 22:11 UTC

To: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: "Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong@huawei.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
References: <5c2a4b36-0c59-709e-23eb-00f4aa1ce52f@joelhalpern.com> <9B89F4C2-5594-4D31-8893-21F3F4A0DF6C@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB569969EE8D1929E7069E1BB0AE550@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <58ED78D3-9E0C-4556-8853-8754B361DF6D@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB5699D79B1FC40662EE9E95B6AE500@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <81A30B25-9857-467E-85AE-1FE84B6F3197@cisco.com> <CAO42Z2zq0chKx08d10JBNkpa5e8J4MWAJWk+2Qs1DD7y_wkYUw@mail.gmail.com> <05981e2ea71c4b3083ed6e15c7e20641@huawei.com> <CAO42Z2wzk7W4_gy6j+sW=1z+xoyMMxsjnUbZkaf=jcG0zZqddg@mail.gmail.com> <A286098D-1EEA-4CBC-9AF4-9B2054D6F2C7@cisco.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Message-ID: <c6f9a05d-5ba5-1b97-d1be-ead911610521@gont.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:11:01 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A286098D-1EEA-4CBC-9AF4-9B2054D6F2C7@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/m0CXyAz5oJcvuQ_ozxemDMrQxug>
Subject: Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea
Precedence: list

On 27/2/20 18:11, Darren Dukes (ddukes) wrote:
> Mark AH is not defined for SRH.  There is no specification to ignore.

Do you realize that you are using IPv6, and that AH is specified for IPv6?

Is the AD watching? -- Seriously, this is going through a very curious 
and dangerous path.

For the interested reader, a longer explanation of the issue:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sbb95BqdPifuRb_NPc3aeiqBbfM/

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

[spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea David Allan I
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Voyer, Daniel
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea David Allan I
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Huzhibo
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Chengli (Cheng Li)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
[spring] Fw: Re: Is srv6 PSP a good idea licong@chinatelecom.cn
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea James Guichard
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Andrew Alston
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Andrew Alston
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Dirk Steinberg
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Dirk Steinberg
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Tom Herbert
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Dirk Steinberg
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea john leddy.net
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea john leddy.net
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
[spring] A permanent change to/violation of RFC82… Mark Smith
Re: [spring] A permanent change to/violation of R… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Darren Dukes (ddukes)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] A permanent change to/violation of R… Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Voyer, Daniel
Re: [spring] A permanent change to/violation of R… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith