Re: [spring] WG Adoption call - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis

Tetsuya Murakami <tetsuya.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 17 September 2021 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <tetsuya.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A973A17E3 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O0WDJnNvI6Uw for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589623A181D for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id m26so10450667pff.3 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=dlCOtfKTZ4SRNAE2nwWgFvH0FhH8e3yTHzDeWs5S+Ek=; b=lJqKOQOLRk1qVGpttkJ37ibgPq9iTgKxSRgAiNV9IqxsPVO61M/mJzFdMxB/+oyQG0 dCd6YIAzw7ZnIYBltYYsYFyqmHzRmFe8ibGPgT4WsEiyoC0zpjcnuf0Dk+/qT1fy1+r4 hzDXm0kh9/ypYPtaz0qzBrVioWjMBVTepnQS+rquDah4m6Yn2POo0DaO3BPRueA/3CCQ U5pkiKJnnGUJGk3I/BNNJzpaFq8PMC5R10+fwCkKRBFisrGXrohhRm4jRZVuHgWio49C 4j+IPX6eyZyqTQe3qZRjRfVRAs2U53jdGH5pDW0fl2H3lMGmiStN+ViSeyX8egDkg+nt Z3OA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=dlCOtfKTZ4SRNAE2nwWgFvH0FhH8e3yTHzDeWs5S+Ek=; b=wCZQP6UJUGFYwQc36Gkx5inrOsIrIPW7e7eyUJubXSYqHvRFUGKc/5p5JT/+C/uzex 0qUXd8XgVtlV8HGff35HxlEuUEdXhZLmRaX3L3snmesk8u8rhcEeUMavaljU3H1j4OcA T2a9WwXY/u7rMPimuH/SjmRhaUvuR3y3/UyS00LdlolQIxNWShE8hlxt01YGn2yh2iEU yHnv9t6B4lJXj3ZqJWUrCKQ27RfMU8wxVwzQ23+T1Cq4TgoaMDoLQQRzMS4eiSSAnqqp zbYhEAXNbMup8szUor03iIAqbM4255/xMsH+21yX6zbeP9E9khhuE4U/+VbzQ8Cg2cp4 dcpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EE/LQNsV+PcxfV/VJxQVROA698F1uMbQLoAlBDWYhwsl4i9BN h9GOEznx78cwFBc8laJeEzVIhfGCMEk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxe2O/6EfhD+wzYyxpUqAAz9DVJMcp+y7M2lEkTiBIQFVReOQOk5IDDKP3meV4eWmJLXT0VsA==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:959a:0:b0:43b:adeb:ef58 with SMTP id z26-20020aa7959a000000b0043badebef58mr12735293pfj.19.1631915509347; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:647:5580:31a0:90fa:9ef2:12c5:4c80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o5sm11248556pjg.40.2021.09.17.14.51.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5B4AE529-8066-4393-8C29-13429565A0A4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Tetsuya Murakami <tetsuya.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <15436_1631020356_61376544_15436_364_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A4CE99E43@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:51:47 -0700
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <213FE590-AE85-4013-A15F-F2AB1FE527DE@gmail.com>
References: <15436_1631020356_61376544_15436_364_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A4CE99E43@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: bruno.decraene@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/mszN_alXkE9kKgc7-kcbcNq_8dY>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 21:51:59 -0000

Hi Chairs,

I support the adoption of these 2 draft as WG document. 

Thanks,
Tetsuya

> On Sep 7, 2021, at 6:12 AM, bruno.decraene@orange.com wrote:
> 
> Dear WG,
>  
>  
> The Design Team has produced two documents:
> - A requirement document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement
> - A solution analysis document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis
>  
> Both have been presented to the WG and triggered some discussions but are still individual documents.
> We believe it's now time for the WG to consider taking ownership of those two documents.
> Note that, especially for those two documents, WG adoption does not necessarily mean RFC publication in particular if it turns out that the benefit of long term archive would not justify the WG and IESG effort to finalize those two documents.
>  
>  
> This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call, ending September  20th 2021, for:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis>
>  
>  
> After review of the document(s) please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption of the document(s) to the mailing list.
> Please also provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack thereof) as this is a stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is not a vote.
>  
> If you are willing to work on the document(s), please state this explicitly. This gives the chairs an indication of the energy level of people in the working group willing to work on the document.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Jim, Bruno & Joel
>  
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>