[spring] 答复: 答复: IPv6+??

Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> Sat, 04 July 2020 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7DF3A0AC8 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 05:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QGu5eYvYOFBe for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 05:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DE623A08BD for <spring@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 05:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E60825E7468BF2BF946E; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 13:09:27 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) by lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 13:09:27 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.41) by lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 13:09:27 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.204]) by dggemm424-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 20:09:22 +0800
From: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
To: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
CC: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
Thread-Topic: =?gb2312?B?W3NwcmluZ10gtPC4tDogSVB2Nis/Pw==?=
Thread-Index: AQHWUV/XdivlUhERMkWwlNxvQxGzYqj3D6aj//+mWYCAAANVgIAAmjhS
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:09:22 +0000
Message-ID: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D937AB448@dggemm512-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <E23B5DB3-F364-43CA-817E-DC6099B555AF@liquidtelecom.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D937AB113@dggemm512-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAO42Z2xbs=+K51=D5a5Am8-jsWZJ9uNw7AqGYaCFZcR64X2=Sg@mail.gmail.com>, <2712885247024880942670708370826b@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <2712885247024880942670708370826b@att.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.176.95]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D937AB448dggemm512mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/mxEtEB-WLwAyn5xyzZAM7xDvSY0>
Subject: [spring] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogILTwuLQ6IElQdjYrPz8=?=
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 12:09:31 -0000

Hi Jim,

I respect the comment from the chair. I propose the following draft (because it is SRv6 work) for your reference on the requirements.



https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tian-spring-srv6-deployment-consideration-01

L

Later there may be more information when update.






Best Regards,
Robin



________________________________
·¢¼þÈË: UTTARO, JAMES [ju1738@att.com]
·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2020Äê7ÔÂ4ÈÕ 18:51
ÊÕ¼þÈË: Mark Smith; Lizhenbin
³­ËÍ: SPRING WG; Andrew Alston
Ö÷Ìâ: RE: [spring] ´ð¸´: IPv6+??

Where are the requirements.. I mean actual ones..

Thanks,
              Jim Uttaro

From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2020 6:40 AM
To: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>rg>; Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
Subject: Re: [spring] ´ð¸´: IPv6+??

Where are the IPv6+ Internet Drafts?


On Sat, 4 Jul 2020, 18:08 Lizhenbin, <lizhenbin@huawei.com<mailto:lizhenbin@huawei.com>> wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for your paying attention to the website. Please refer to my clarification.



a. SRv6 is the technology based on IPv6. In the past 20+ years IPv6 has being deployed. One of the most important drives is the address space. The development of 5G and cloud proposes the new chances for the development and deployment of IPv6. Depending on the native IP reacheability and providing rich attributes based on the IPv6 extension headers, IPv6 can provide flexible connectivity to satisfy the requirements of 5G and cloud. SRv6 is the typical representative solutions. This makes this round of IPv6-based innovations and deployments shows the new characteristics of the times to some extent. Then IPv6+ concept is proposed.  It means the solutions is based on IPv6 and used for the scenarios of 5G and cloud.

b. IPv6+  has nothing with the New IP. It is apparent that the solutions proposed in the IPv6+ are based on the IPv6 and all the standardization work is being done in IETF and has nothing with ITU-T.



I am not sure if it is appropriate to discuss this work in the mailing list of SPRING WG.  More questions and comments can be sent to ipv6plus@outlook.com<mailto:ipv6plus@outlook.com>.





Best Regards,

Robin







________________________________
·¢¼þÈË: spring [spring-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org>] ´ú±í Andrew Alston [Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com<mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>]
·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2020Äê7ÔÂ4ÈÕ 1:31
ÊÕ¼þÈË: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
Ö÷Ìâ: [spring] IPv6+??
Hi All,

I came across this website: https://www.ipv6plus.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ipv6plus.net_&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q&m=xY6EacJ5lx2Wdodq3HVdOJnLu47yv-NeOtF_pims9wo&s=MRwEZihBF6LGmyvanssazkk5goh92USabH9rzxSuIcg&e=>

Now, I wish to clarify a few things.


  1.  This website seems to imply ¨C strong ¨C that Srv6 is not infact IPv6 ¨C but rather IPv6+ - is this the position of the member of this working group or is this simply someones bizarre idea?

[Robin

  1.  This site seems heavily related to the new ip stuff that was presented to the ITU ¨C does anyone here know if there is any actual relation between this and that crowd?

Thanks

Andrew

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_spring&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q&m=xY6EacJ5lx2Wdodq3HVdOJnLu47yv-NeOtF_pims9wo&s=b-d6W4ys7Vc5jHULav7uoajVG1yo_F5vTpaluGS1eIw&e=>