Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Wed, 04 March 2020 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505053A1223; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:26:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C46lPbr9D15R; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:26:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B8143A1239; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:26:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8CC983427; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:25:58 +0100 (CET)
To: bruno.decraene@orange.com, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Cc: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
References: =?utf-8?q?=3C17421=5F1575566127=5F5DE93B2F=5F17421=5F93=5F1=5F53?= =?utf-8?q?C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48D1A3DA=40OPEXCAUBM43=2Ecorporate?= =?utf-8?q?=2Eadroot=2Einfra=2Eftgroup=3E_=3C5518=5F1582908787=5F5E594573=5F?= =?utf-8?q?5518=5F436=5F1=5F53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD1BCA=40OPEXC?= =?utf-8?q?AUBM43=2Ecorporate=2Eadroot=2Einfra=2Eftgroup=3E?= =?utf-8?q?=3CC8417F71-D61E-42AC-831E-B85269D5D4A5=40steffann=2Enl=3E_=3C829?= =?utf-8?q?7=5F1583155968=5F5E5D0B00=5F8297=5F207=5F1=5F53C29892C857584299CB?= =?utf-8?q?F5D05346208A48DD4F8F=40OPEXCAUBM43=2Ecorporate=2Eadroot=2Einfra?= =?utf-8?q?=2Eftgroup=3E_=3CB656E21A-6E86-4A65-B260-82E0CCB29E7B=40steffann?= =?utf-8?q?=2Enl=3E_=3C13027=5F1583251625=5F5E5E80A9=5F13027=5F228=5F1=5F53C?= =?utf-8?q?29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD81CF=40OPEXCAUBM43=2Ecorporate?= =?utf-8?q?=2Eadroot=2Einfra=2Eftgroup=3E?=
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Message-ID: <38569e17-728a-3618-b611-734a963cd44b@gont.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:36:17 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3C13027=5F1583251625=5F5E5E80A9=5F13027=5F228=5F1=5F?= =?utf-8?q?53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48DD81CF=40OPEXCAUBM43=2Ecorporat?= =?utf-8?q?e=2Eadroot=2Einfra=2Eftgroup=3E?=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/odkMyhc1LUd-h6uHp9yNlDgnCTg>
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 16:26:05 -0000

On 3/3/20 13:07, bruno.decraene@orange.com wrote:
[....]
> 
> Good.
> How do you propose that we get an evaluation and formal answer from the IESG on this point?
> My proposal is to ask while asking the IESG review on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming.

THat seems to late in the process.

May I ask what's the status of this I-D?  -

On one hand, both you and Martin declared consensus to move it forward. 
On another hand, the authors keep making changes to address comments 
(good) so what the wg will ship will be different from what the document 
on which you claimed consensus. Besides, the datatrackers lists the 
document as "in WGLC".

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1