Re: [spring] How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Fri, 22 May 2020 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605AE3A09A6; Fri, 22 May 2020 07:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=hO0oVIKz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=YQkOhScm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FZ-ehFJYgJrj; Fri, 22 May 2020 07:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CA513A0958; Fri, 22 May 2020 07:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108161.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04MEC5lD019881; Fri, 22 May 2020 07:16:40 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=KqejmvNe9NccZ29ufOuPPI5ZUkevCEYJWMNrQsld+M8=; b=hO0oVIKz33uEjn8XPgTMsDVwdT1lBH1MfvGU8MiO0L1bgPueXOyJwwzNPTA8FSDZvKSh MbE2GInyBvk6VyTHtHN7UWPla5x0svwp8vuAUNqmZyH277OWk3To36yMN9MApQOmJd/e dtMb8EvGU8QFRo5Y8MtEmkuBrvniNWLodT36zSXEUtyTkTn5bLKe9Z8d40ipmqX4ROFb SREI+dXpGXxCmIvm+S5EaxHOFCOeQCHNC4GOOJkXO85zmOpreyUFjUJhogOp1/Gi3EHO RgFgIkHLzbfr1RuEIca3n2uS7WBYp9uORaSaP+wYteOon7f/JwTs2JO/8t101YxrPPDT 9Q==
Received: from nam10-bn7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn7nam10lp2101.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.70.101]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 312f9yuxqe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 22 May 2020 07:16:39 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hfwYuqzCcVGdSsdI/HDrrhUT70aFMhaqHNQ9BWNV/srp2uv4RJr8faR3upzvtKMebIJhBSdwY0ohHS4tvJliorqp92LyTRzoiyAXZ2NYeO7rzAmLkvcBPpAUCuUKSPFowkwoviF8gcpcKFOgxab754CbE5eybbx+xIrK56mgIjY+chLZgteb3BFGSNaEVQomDsw5EdLS2blbqJqnS/XRLZc00f337t31kwY4az+TFXoFFzE+5eBgzwTKtHnRKXcdHads4o8sfx0+kkAt1a+VltcEAwyQO9Ep0wtl5AIvkTGt3XGjrnZXd+xG6gv0C0gglYlVc81pnbQDsglYO4tCUA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KqejmvNe9NccZ29ufOuPPI5ZUkevCEYJWMNrQsld+M8=; b=D68/Wp6pLUWT2hOEJp++maCOzHp+/J0eaw4E9B4RsQ+OjQF2mtbB+a+qIIm+oqow2nTe0t8Mcb+CEugv3F2WiOjWx6bHoUwpu4Wr41jLbcG2b8wsNS9P9HYlMV3K50/GuH6oMhVmGys38lewSvLGUvGd6EpUFAjg13FBhlWGLl/NJBtNKWYJy/FU1SCknbmZ9Lt1XoK75kYY/H8M7Y/Ewqfuk0ITugHLFsyBwueSO4H6/2sZ8OddpcCqyMmmMYOB+KWbUEdx2xUh9hrzcq6JisxjR4VZPMJLIxG9P4OV0RFU612S8rz7UfG0Vl+UGI++LoqHzcrVu6yPQVZQOxM3MQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KqejmvNe9NccZ29ufOuPPI5ZUkevCEYJWMNrQsld+M8=; b=YQkOhScmw3sd5woD6xt+J4ddiPaVGYv3iiw/DP2yoRvBJoVFSABBVZIx6wpIVUf9zdlV676v3zqUklBbsnkii67LGOExfw5EaEEMFhJDJkmmKeBjP0E8KvbGpDQkAzITqKGp+r22U+9Ak/XbOLKnXByGjZ1Y0vs4Dol4TFG1gvM=
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:122::15) by DM6PR05MB4089.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:92::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3000.11; Fri, 22 May 2020 14:16:38 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3]) by DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.019; Fri, 22 May 2020 14:16:38 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
CC: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Thread-Index: AdYwBYkgTau2vInrR6WP+x+iqlpN9gAPJDmw
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 14:16:38 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR05MB63482CFA4D5AB938D5A4B818AEB40@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02A2CD12@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02A2CD12@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-05-22T14:16:35Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=afbdbcbb-3ea4-4b3a-94be-a2e502c133e1; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=2
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.4.0.45
dlp-reaction: no-action
authentication-results: huawei.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;huawei.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [108.28.233.91]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 052a4cad-e404-4008-5049-08d7fe5abde7
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB4089:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB40890FED85BE38689267C2A6AEB40@DM6PR05MB4089.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6108;
x-forefront-prvs: 04111BAC64
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(64756008)(86362001)(8936002)(9686003)(66556008)(66946007)(7696005)(110136005)(66476007)(966005)(66446008)(186003)(52536014)(53546011)(76116006)(316002)(33656002)(2906002)(71200400001)(166002)(5660300002)(26005)(4326008)(6506007)(478600001)(8676002)(55016002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR05MB63482CFA4D5AB938D5A4B818AEB40DM6PR05MB6348namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 052a4cad-e404-4008-5049-08d7fe5abde7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 May 2020 14:16:38.1720 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: RMX6RwsRDCqOWrG+Dt2//mQd9kz3v1/G0SWe6tPfuU94yT83i01ahGHy+WlcE3AfL+kL6kEYZM61P7IyZhsBlw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB4089
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-22_05:2020-05-22, 2020-05-22 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005220115
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/vpFtx4cM_ETFde0Pfr_iGePpcZE>
Subject: Re: [spring] How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 14:16:52 -0000

Cheng,

The sole purpose of a Routing header is to steer a packet along a specified path to its destination. It shouldn't attempt to do any more than that.

The CRH does not attempt to deliver service function information to service function instances. However, it is compatible with:


  *   The Network Service Header (NSH)
  *   The Destination Options header that precedes the Routing header

Both of these can be used to deliver service function information to service function instances.

                                                                                                                     Ron




Juniper Business Use Only
From: Chengli (Cheng Li) <c.l@huawei.com>
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 2:56 AM
To: 6man <6man@ietf.org>; spring@ietf.org; Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Hi Ron,

When reading the CRH draft, I have a question about how CRH support SFC?

For example, we have a SID List [S1, S2, S3, S4, S5], and S3 is a SFC related SID, how to indicate that? By PSSI? [1]

But how to know which segment endpoint node/egress node should process this PSSI? At the beginning of the SRm6 design, this is described in [2]. But you deleted the containers [2].

Without that, I don't really understand how SFC can be supported.


Best,
Cheng



[1]. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-01#section-4.1<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-spring-sr-mapped-six-01*section-4.1__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!UD4vf0darQ9cskFhH1fJ9jwZJ-nIciQxgVnf1219YuyyaNcgvNdRUdkjwP15i-Xa$>
[2]. https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bonica-6man-seg-end-opt-04.txt<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bonica-6man-seg-end-opt-04.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!UD4vf0darQ9cskFhH1fJ9jwZJ-nIciQxgVnf1219YuyyaNcgvNdRUdkjwNmXwyHT$>.