IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] New drafts from SRCOMP design team

Rishabh Parekh <rishabhp@gmail.com> Fri, 26 February 2021 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rishabhp@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07C03A13C9; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:50:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ocgjBefK5qQE; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:50:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ED513A13C4; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:50:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id a18so1178782wrc.13; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:50:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Xui9dEwmPQo2QGrFdLwnIf8G81nOij6gsf2/BV+Iu6Q=; b=pVudld2qvqxvRFcN4o+GsTsrntSUaJ85u0Of5h3MeWLRhb7DyvqE7kFUgGQzdhBk0F 6DUW5amZ2r9hrvf5kfwjFgfX1cG2wXDRrwP2qqWpgerZFEZJxZcoiJmXi2TTWENK7PYF 0BfiPHPzHaI+HeKJ88sc3g5o0fHjqKt4gTSBoGlhbAyQGlSxylaGoHXPpDiUjL4Gz9nf /SJ40SO8YKZcL3uZ/e2ROuuvNrbsLiZdnh+nlJPQagCUFk4Uh8D0PqGd7EbZSG5KwnV9 qyj6ePaoG9oGJDBJ4f/J4LH9/TTyHviBVx6Esas0uMAlFJvcAukvxGHfOlkwj6uf5yeD n/EQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Xui9dEwmPQo2QGrFdLwnIf8G81nOij6gsf2/BV+Iu6Q=; b=TyqjmZXwjpU2R2UxPEUeYaFgKzn4/HeI3wKhFzhbcOS+TPAhmxFHvjms44O9qbISli MSOAD4c+FwGzwQ95AkNJS29qNKK8PO+FsSd2UmuzVNH0P/j7GQXZweqMLWpCXzTzrCH2 KwzTAEaBjvMS+bDt4cbDfT6l01fYc+Pd+ULHANiewwjXdimHoCKyM5b60RSaK1NTiBZL E1KbxM8I79DK3kgl5KdNLcAME29Vi7Rr79oHTTeImtEU6Hb0+pQ6LHBymOUjiSs9GWRU WP71oP5GIDglWrp2JUX9XdHXk7AR6iLvUqJqsaofVFq3IQjBxk3n8EGZWwDwH1vPpWVM fSsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Phzqhg4y16qww+nPqebTLzPvD7MWci2QjboLF2Nk52b5JOSTE EGSK1sxGzGtSjM5cVDvbx2k+MsdZW7rRgN88Qvtll1n5zcY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwU51d8qQDZJiWGyUGcc3fRFYqNqW4nbHzzpDrEobcmehTHf9O1lYosu11vm96K3d5eezamDpPZX2bFrnCVqo8=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:fc46:: with SMTP id e6mr4474741wrs.389.1614361813575; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:50:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <05ce01d70b9a$f1c38230$d54a8690$@com>
In-Reply-To: <05ce01d70b9a$f1c38230$d54a8690$@com>
From: Rishabh Parekh <rishabhp@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:50:02 -0800
Message-ID: <CABjMoXYSiHbgNeXJExXiANhDtrw8h5i77+LyzBxLMF1GqpseFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
Cc: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, srcomp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006fec4e05bc40e6c3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/paVe63TGkORyPr_tOsUkJLPRekI>
Subject: Re: [spring] New drafts from SRCOMP design team
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:50:17 -0000

 Weiqiang,
Text quoted below from the SPRING charter indirectly covers
Point-to-Multipoint requirement which is addressed by SR Replication
Segment draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment/

New types of segments mapping to forwarding behaviour (e.g., local
ingress replication, local forwarding resources, a pre-existing
replication structure) if needed for new usages.

For the Point-to-Multipoint compression requirement, what exactly is
"multicast address" in the Metric? Is this an IPv6 multicast address? If
so, it really does not conform to SRv6 data plane.

I would rather consider the SRv6 Replication SID, described in the latest
version of SR Replication segment draft, to be the Metric for measuring
P2MP requirement. Maybe we should also consider adding it to SRv6
Functionality Section 4.2.1 of the compression requirements draft.

-Rishabh


On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 9:25 AM Weiqiang Cheng <
chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Two drafts have been submitted.  Please review them and any comments are
> welcomed.
>
>
>
> Compression requirement draft -04 version provided two more requirements:
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-04.txt
>
>
>
> Compression analysis draft -00 provided a skeleton for the analysis of 4
> candidate proposals.
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis-00.txt
>
>
>
> B.R.
>
> Weiqiang
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email