Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea
Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com> Wed, 26 February 2020 14:25 UTC
Return-Path: <andrew.alston@liquidtelecom.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2D03A084F for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:25:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZ3-QoOheh2R for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:24:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-182.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-182.mimecast.com [207.82.80.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A9E3A07C8 for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:24:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR04-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur04lp2050.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.13.50]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-164-1JPFpiSPO6WvO85RQr4fdA-1; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:24:50 +0000
X-MC-Unique: 1JPFpiSPO6WvO85RQr4fdA-1
Received: from DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (20.179.47.79) by DBBPR03MB5383.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (20.179.46.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.21; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:24:48 +0000
Received: from DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::31cd:8171:1d1f:2fa9]) by DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::31cd:8171:1d1f:2fa9%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2750.021; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:24:48 +0000
From: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
To: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
CC: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea
Thread-Index: AQHVr85eIxhhXGQj4EiMiWFpx7GLc6e1XsCAgAGdL4CAAmwmgIAFDvkAgAThOYCAacAMgIAAnH0AgAAjW4CAABMRgIAADBoAgAAGsSCAAAJdQA==
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:24:48 +0000
Message-ID: <DBBPR03MB5415C910A5FE36C9769BB8B4EEEA0@DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <5c2a4b36-0c59-709e-23eb-00f4aa1ce52f@joelhalpern.com> <9B89F4C2-5594-4D31-8893-21F3F4A0DF6C@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB569969EE8D1929E7069E1BB0AE550@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <58ED78D3-9E0C-4556-8853-8754B361DF6D@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB5699D79B1FC40662EE9E95B6AE500@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <81A30B25-9857-467E-85AE-1FE84B6F3197@cisco.com> <CAO42Z2zq0chKx08d10JBNkpa5e8J4MWAJWk+2Qs1DD7y_wkYUw@mail.gmail.com> <05981e2ea71c4b3083ed6e15c7e20641@huawei.com> <CAO42Z2wzk7W4_gy6j+sW=1z+xoyMMxsjnUbZkaf=jcG0zZqddg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMHE7XaWKSy=y5-0kz5aOT9vWgMCRmc=WURX12-LX1TOzg@mail.gmail.com> <7B51F0BE-CE40-42B8-9D87-0B764B6E00C5@steffann.nl> <DBBPR03MB541529B1A1859DC25E324E13EEEA0@DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DBBPR03MB541529B1A1859DC25E324E13EEEA0@DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2c0f:fe40:3:1:4a7:7d57:f0b4:cca7]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8945c55d-83da-4d78-a57b-08d7bac7a29d
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DBBPR03MB5383:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DBBPR03MB5383293BEC02B2481DF1611BEEEA0@DBBPR03MB5383.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0325F6C77B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(136003)(199004)(189003)(66476007)(5660300002)(76116006)(71200400001)(4326008)(2940100002)(478600001)(54906003)(7696005)(66946007)(66446008)(52536014)(33656002)(64756008)(66556008)(110136005)(6506007)(81156014)(186003)(8676002)(55016002)(86362001)(81166006)(316002)(2906002)(8936002)(9686003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DBBPR03MB5383; H:DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: hZmQEy0YQNC8uB97iL6VvqxnRDLHDIXbTuSLk+z4rK4kUz2sXaT4X3snIe8v8mLOQdHiO4NzkoXZ5igMFx2DG6uIqUcwORmyFk7ROJcJfarIxL97mUYrE0O/S6kX7dhcOjsUE77nah2wBfb75PFm331vNLavgxR+YhfrZ27fVlXMpA9+KDM/qA5X0LjrggF6FfQNBlCbrzknAtlFthKSQLz8DvcHurkHDhOQ0tpIonOluZu0JqmD+3mqp/VAWC4Pu57zHEJ0dBB5we/VCbWkuHRaI17s1Prq94Ka1+2qLOXrjiqKgWWMPAtLslV4P3pVbCnp1elCrBks73uYz42VtEBfYKVQqDEhZFzTqYQ8rD2iOZzcjOnIWs4i9m/UDV+7XEvFLo/bwv4bgrW/Jqx+pBx9mH70z/INP8bVVTu8XQxkP/dPvM/7oC3iBYoCwZKw
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: qFiLOO9nHfPIfVG8SzRBuEPpwInqKA7vqAbeiug94YMLk08Fxc+ViiOqPcADKiZpVQnm4j0HyF95Kyf69qmdS3Wt+BsoTKtqo8oO4LLQB7cbJKXptqOATZsVAKvKMLVHwgbHDuUb8QL4B40CDzItG58Jly8O1jhHeLX9+XKOK2aublzZxqLBXPsUTgYK+F+Cbwz4g83a21xdn+Nm19XSnQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: liquidtelecom.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8945c55d-83da-4d78-a57b-08d7bac7a29d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Feb 2020 14:24:48.4254 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 68792612-0f0e-46cb-b16a-fcb82fd80cb1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: BRsYuq7r9ogRiZXIYdS9eZPhFH/ZxusHmL8UPAjnGxL65SJW6oFEITvzrn7wA2PgYPSfRDp+JRiZt6AvKc/ZVUEY4JdFNaFvJ1VXC7qwpBs=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DBBPR03MB5383
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: liquidtelecom.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DBBPR03MB5415C910A5FE36C9769BB8B4EEEA0DBBPR03MB5415eurp_"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/32iiLVWYZJ7V7Q51dEZl9C_JlxM>
Subject: Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:25:09 -0000
Figured I'd add to this - as I continued to read the charter SPRING WG should avoid modification to existing data planes that would make them incompatible with existing deployments. Where possible, existing control and management plane protocols must be used within existing architectures to implement the SPRING function. Any modification of -or extension to- existing architectures, data planes, or control or management plane protocols should be carried out in the WGs responsible for the architecture, data plane, or control or management plane protocol being modified and in coordination with the SPRING WG, but may be done in SPRING WG after agreement with all the relevant WG chairs and responsible Area Directors. If SRv6 is not IPv6 - as is the contention - (which in my view is an absolutely false contention designed to step around a specification because it simply doesn't suite what you want) - well - then what exactly are we doing here - because by that claim - we are inventing a new control plane, a new data plane, and well, it's a new protocol - so - do we have the agreement of the relevant WG chairs, Area Directors etc - to invent an entirely new everything. Didn't think so.... Andrew
- [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea David Allan I
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Voyer, Daniel
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea David Allan I
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Huzhibo
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
- [spring] Fw: Re: Is srv6 PSP a good idea licong@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea James Guichard
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Dirk Steinberg
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Dirk Steinberg
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Dirk Steinberg
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea john leddy.net
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea john leddy.net
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
- [spring] A permanent change to/violation of RFC82… Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] A permanent change to/violation of R… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] A permanent change to/violation of R… Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Voyer, Daniel
- Re: [spring] A permanent change to/violation of R… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith