IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Progressing draft-ietf-spring-network-programming: Finding a compromise

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Fri, 28 February 2020 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1843A0AF4; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:22:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N8kREQlQ-C7z; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:22:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5218D3A0964; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:22:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F66A49; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 20:21:47 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1582917705; bh=N0j9TCaAVONsLYh2ePC AGQQtEks0m7H4CRPj3nQFoJY=; b=PCi03FAWwIP9UeCSUNDbWs6iIeCrzMmB5yc JXBwfRZdWbzbJHV2rDVR2ox+XUnf6E7BxHSfQ15AQQG9hdRzSgB4j94f5SOMrS+O 5MGoPb4JvGd8e+ONxK+qTVgpsM37yI9AjVP/z/LK1SElSqzPGQWhPt/eaR729fUf nq4P65aE=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id qbDvDwv0TF_a; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 20:21:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:d99f:7257:bc1b:f895] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:d99f:7257:bc1b:f895]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA32F3C; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 20:21:44 +0100 (CET)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <4E0021BE-B0A1-4B61-B201-EB45AC9CE8E2@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5CC30291-7367-4A79-8698-43163888B067"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\))
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 20:21:43 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMEhXBnCuN3-Ejvnynp6ffPN1yY0Ky9V7L6CWwv5TaikoA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
References: <DM6PR05MB6348247DCDC7B7AC3ECACCAEAEE80@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMEhXBnCuN3-Ejvnynp6ffPN1yY0Ky9V7L6CWwv5TaikoA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/qm3iq0cVfXiVB_HI_xOJ_0NgbKc>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing draft-ietf-spring-network-programming: Finding a compromise
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 19:22:27 -0000

Hi,

> I love your definition of "compromise": "You do what we tell you to do".

It's called "respecting the feedback from the working group"

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email