Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

Dear Chairs,

please excuse my late reply, I am catching up with the list after some
weeks of travel.

I strongly believe that the WG should standardize one and only one solution
for SRv6 header compression. More than one solution would mean pain
for both vendors and operators.

Based on the DT analysis it appears to me that CSID meets the
requirements and is the best solution.

I support adoption of CSID as a SRv6 header compression standard.

Dirk

On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 3:36 PM Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi chairs, I’m just catching up on SPRING after a few weeks away for
> summer vacation.
>
> Yes we should standardize one SRv6 compression proposal. CSID meets the
> requirements and I would like to see it adopted.
>
> Darren
> ------------------------------
> *From:* spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Joel M. Halpern <
> jmh@joelhalpern.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 4, 2021 2:53 PM
> *To:* spring@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
>
> The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts
> on the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the
> working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic
> for a separate email a bit later.
>
> Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and
> the perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the
> discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to
> everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to
> re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the
> discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their
> opinion is and an explanation of why.
>
> The question we are asking you to comment on is:
>
> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?
>
> Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of
> business PDT on 20-August-2021.
>
> Thank you,
> Joel, Jim, and Bruno
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>