Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

["Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <[e-mail]>]

“Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
compressing SRv6 information?”

Yes, only one data plane behavior as standards track document.
As discussed, there are precedents in other WGs for similar processes and standardizing on a single data plane solution helped move forward.

Thanks.
Jorge


From: spring <[e-mail]> on behalf of Joel M. Halpern <[e-mail]>
Date: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 11:52 AM
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts
on the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the
working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic
for a separate email a bit later.

Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and
the perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the
discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to
everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to
re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the
discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their
opinion is and an explanation of why.

The question we are asking you to comment on is:

Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
compressing SRv6 information?

Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of
business PDT on 20-August-2021.

Thank you,
Joel, Jim, and Bruno

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring