IETF Logo Mail Archive

[spring] A possible additional topic for the discussion by the MPLS Open DT.

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 20 April 2021 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599043A145C; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h7rB9imjT-ee; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F6303A145B; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id l22so37600056ljc.9; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XC+DjwEj046DVQgZNvBYKG1eX+hQaF9cvmgsQdw2n+U=; b=m9JnJ57SCZZrliF2o3xzY9XDhjj7te1UdV0JPcUjPQ2ltLx2sr0OoxeD++wQFzFAWc F8sGhl1lGyHaw8UTmBOYW3H3/fy7X9E79f3SRIXaDXfY5GRe+xQMpRPo4witToBHQj6m jNvR0Ffpepv48X5SCbTJcylLQhBpVusvUtwbbR4zRYbmQhj5lw+1jEc/JSyrdYAlh1cA ff8P4gmr/GhRRfmU4DEzSF0V+6mpNiiLPAN7m5fYF1IWqlVKCWCjcqOesPRSQBEqSGQt iF1ci1tmI5ptcVagtnq3MKNl9Z4j8vPY5rCDCabPG2Y/zcFKsX0qJaND8d1594AHhJb6 HxzA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XC+DjwEj046DVQgZNvBYKG1eX+hQaF9cvmgsQdw2n+U=; b=UCF9AyZOcHeS31WucNrir3Eu+K5WDKMpaJILcUPPd7URZvk3lUKNLTRm+hi3EHzxZj qG2mkhUtO2zxPAo/pb0xMC/8SeKmMO6MwWApZ5yJy/bvWGE0fw8ZhJKjyXDzIpOnjwmP E8eAVMUu8BexYrP7e3khysGrSiEg21IchWWAPxbpgQY0lSx+1ZVndBazwywEyMYwaYyf 9nemVF6V9TAQZLyAG6Zg85RvguCabDGi+KWUaQJKbZPXhnw7F4EpzYn7ffNaRJt0gH8e /h1SNb8hgCAX/7kg2F2chBidPhZaFp9NAt32hPzsKRSUeIfgC92MsJri/gGrYuQdu+a0 AM+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532z5KaFkuWK69GesCIW4o6qBbVvjhipPve6dYFubWOwH34ieVdU +jW4q4fmn3uxscP7jbJ8p2MvcGgu1XZm8tjT4OZEjd4+3LGvEA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqkBg1V42DMr6CXDv/zKuM2iSOWFApBaOS2vWI6+6Aygxu5dXxkcFQfWk3tXGVOOGrUbbvnTAwZnZofhZ+pQQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:2cf:: with SMTP id f15mr13938946ljo.133.1618947754500; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:42:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVZY7jaZ=tRqwCFc8_JGqJ5NN6mMvGTDSmC3TpAUgq8XA@mail.gmail.com>
To: MPLS Working Group <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org>, spring-chairs@ietf.org, pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>, pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>, huubatwork@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000d13d2605c06ca5bb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/rtvBN7iQEOFY_OGzNFt0EESMPSw>
Subject: [spring] A possible additional topic for the discussion by the MPLS Open DT.
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:42:44 -0000

Dear All,
Stewart, Adrian, Italo, Huub, and I had discussed the question of multiple
GALs in an MPLS label stack after the IETF-110. The question is directly
related to the mechanism proposed in draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification/>.
I've put together a short draft (attached). It appears, that this issue may
fit in the scope of the work of the MPLS Open DT. Appreciate your thoughts
on whether it can be discussed at one of the Open DT meetings. Also,
welcome your comments, suggestion on the attached draft.

Regards,
Greg (on behalf of the group)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email