[spring] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-12: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 24 April 2023 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: spring@ietf.org
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978F8C14CE5E; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 06:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, bruno.decraene@orange.com, bruno.decraene@orange.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 10.0.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <168234194260.20545.7426421938431378687@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 06:12:22 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/tqqyvNRYAu-1miCai2ImHd6GEEI>
Subject: [spring] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 13:12:22 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thank you for the work put into this document.

Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be
appreciated even if only for my own education), and one nit.

Special thanks to Bruno Decraene for the shepherd's detailed write-up including
the WG consensus *and* the justification of the intended status.

Please note that Dave Thaler is the Internet directorate reviewer (at my
request) and you may want to consider this int-dir review as well when it will
be available (no need to wait for it though):
Even a double thanks to Dave as he also did an early int-dir review (and I
noted the authors' reaction to this early review).

I hope that this review helps to improve the document,



# COMMENTS (non blocking)

## Acronyms

May I suggest to also expand acronyms at first use *outside* the abstract ?
E.g., SFF

## Section 3

The reader will understand better figure 1 with:

* the packet outside border having a different border than the
functions/devices (e.g., using '/' rather than '|') * the packet headers being
closer to (1) and (4) * referring in the text to the steps (1), (2), ...

## Section 5.2

Should the cache be emptied when a packet came back ? or on time-out (as either
no reply or multiple replies could be expected). The reader has to wait until
section 9 to get some hints (and it is unclear whether the caching refers to
the section 5.2 caching).

## Section 9

In absence of cache entry, should the text specify that the packet is dropped ?
Or should a ICMP sent back to the SF ?

# NITS (non blocking / cosmetic)

## Section 6.2

s/128 bits IPv6 address/128-bit IPv6 address/ ?