Re: [spring] A possible additional topic for the discussion by the MPLS Open DT.

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 27 April 2021 07:09 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70DEC3A13D5 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4NrB7z6yfIJ5 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C79F3A13D8 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.7] (c83-250-136-37.bredband.comhem.se [83.250.136.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A98E32461F for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:08:58 +0200 (CEST)
To: spring@ietf.org
References: <202104271111147656641@zte.com.cn>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <c7501560-07aa-5638-be25-c928fc856b46@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:08:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <202104271111147656641@zte.com.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/ttJeZoR4v7V2KLVgwDm123BSUBc>
Subject: Re: [spring] A possible additional topic for the discussion by the MPLS Open DT.
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:09:06 -0000

Greg,

Sure, just prepare a detailed walk through, discussing what is new, what 
is different, what the architectural implications are, backwards 
compatibility, etc.

/Loa

On 27/04/2021 05:11, gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com wrote:
> Hi Loa,
> 
> thank you for your kind offer. Would posting the draft by Wednesday, 
> before the meeting on Thursday be acceptable?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Greg Mirsky
> 
> 
> Sr. Standardization Expert
> 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline 
> Product R&D Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
> 
> 
> 	
> E: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com <mailto:gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com>
> www.zte.com.cn <http://www.zte.com.cn/>
> 
> Original Mail
> *Sender: *LoaAndersson
> *To: *Greg Mirsky;MPLS Working 
> Group;mpls;spring;spring-chairs@ietf.org;pwe3;pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org;
> *CC: *huubatwork@gmail.com;Stewart Bryant;Italo Busi;Adrian Farrel;
> *Date: *2021/04/26 01:25
> *Subject: **Re: [spring] A possible additional topic for the discussion 
> by the MPLS Open DT.*
> Greg,
> 
> Do you plan to post this - if you do so timely I'm prepared to give you
> 30 min for a walk through at the DT meeting on Tuesday.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> On 20/04/2021 21:42, Greg Mirsky wrote:
>  > Dear All,
>  > Stewart, Adrian, Italo, Huub, and I had discussed the question of
>  > multiple GALs in an MPLS label stack after the IETF-110. The question is
>  > directly related to the mechanism proposed in
>  > draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification
>  > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification/>.
>  > I've put together a short draft (attached). It appears, that this issue
>  > may fit in the scope of the work of the MPLS Open DT. Appreciate
>  > your thoughts on whether it can be discussed at one of the Open DT
>  > meetings. Also, welcome your comments, suggestion on the attached draft.
>  >
>  > Regards,
>  > Greg (on behalf of the group)
> 
> -- 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> 

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64