Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03

Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> Tue, 03 November 2020 09:22 UTC

Return-Path: <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD8B3A1550; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 01:22:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-BNQDjUXH3A; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 01:22:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DA3A3A152C; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 01:22:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml720-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 41E0BABFD27A7787FEA1; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:22:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml720-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.71) by lhreml720-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:22:29 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.214) by lhreml720-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:22:28 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.215]) by DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.214]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:22:23 +0800
From: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, spring <spring@ietf.org>
CC: ippm-chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, spring-chairs <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03
Thread-Index: AQHWscLWZvayuLIpG0WjojkmFXAILg==
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:22:23 +0000
Message-ID: EB740661-4474-4E61-BC4B-D695F7C151CE
References: <DM6PR13MB3066C5FBF6F679E4F51C3D29D21D0@DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR13MB3066C5FBF6F679E4F51C3D29D21D0@DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EB74066144744E61BC4BD695F7C151CE_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/u2uztsOcDMNp6SNfx4UwmTsj3IY>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 09:22:33 -0000

Hi All,

I support the adoption of the draft.


Best Regards,

Zhenbin (Robin)

--------------------------------------------------
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745<tel:+86-13651017745>/+968-91797068
Email: lizhenbin@huawei.com<mailto:lizhenbin@huawei.com>

发件人:James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
收件人:spring <spring@ietf.org>
抄 送:ippm-chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>;spring-chairs <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
时 间:2020-10-22 20:53:25
主 题:[spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03

Dear WG:

This message starts a 3 week WG adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03, ending November 12th 2020. Please note that this document has several changes from v-02 that were requested by the SPRING and IPPM chairs. For this reason, the chairs have extended the adoption call for an additional week to allow the WG enough time to review these changes before deciding on WG adoption.

Some background:

Several review comments were received previously for document https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02. The SPRING and IPPM chairs considered those comments, and upon review of this version of the document, determined the following:


  *   The SPRING document should describe only the procedures relevant to SPRING with pointers to non-SPRING document/s that define any extensions. Several extensions including Control Code Field Extension for STAMP Messages, Loss Measurement Query Message Extensions, Loss Measurement Response Message Extensions, Node Address TLV Extensions, and Return Path TLV Extensions were included in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 and should be removed from the SPRING document.
  *   The STAMP extensions included in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 should be described in a new document published in the IPPM WG.

These conclusions were discussed with the authors of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 the result of which is the publication of the following two documents:


  *   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03. The subject of this WG adoption call.
  *   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-00. This document will be progressed (if determined by the WG) within the IPPM WG.

After review of the SPRING document please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption to the mailing list. Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack thereof) as silence will not be considered as consent.

Finally, the chairs would like to thank the authors for their efforts in this matter.

Thanks!

Jim, Bruno, & Joel