IETF Logo Mail Archive

[spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security (ends Aug/19)

Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net> Tue, 20 August 2024 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A59C151080 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=forwardingplane.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NgcVpFFx-tRX for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D722DC14F609 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-45327512c3eso32772971cf.3 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=forwardingplane.net; s=google; t=1724176597; x=1724781397; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=C6o5ORk0FsQcaExYotiD7zlqV0rPTxTWggy8T5N92uc=; b=Y8+bllZzi22DemaOasv2gFMyMkuuptrHZjFjUwC8CYiXSTjp7aeiPlaEw4OEX4ZuId /ddz+JM36I3SmXZEM2zT5Ta9gB2vameF47vsNQhVyKWqwv1lMQRVfUndv4aP+WEJh/+E BdigQsPCJS6grNCppcwDllSITP8d6ZXmceFxY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724176597; x=1724781397; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=C6o5ORk0FsQcaExYotiD7zlqV0rPTxTWggy8T5N92uc=; b=H4UiOO7sdVBiNvuEoeOCXdTOI0CeLgqSV95nGnrfoi9AQ7cyNatyLq0gxkXVf1H44G iRo0PCJ4l32w4sf8aaZ/iHty/DnjoBAZNDXwh5OdKKNMSuoDhYTxyXVrJmAjB8s2Cn2s YtrhgaTX7+YZ9WFSY9McAh6mnKA9aKOPklNpXj5e4aap9kNoC7/DJd06Uyg6FxsgvlkL R5Gc1lqK/dXxJMl3kJex6i5uMfhgj/aANnAHP640ax5FeSGbjkyq6R8UvUXrDlSccSfv 8H6xaNsa/hYU1P5eFzzc6FRT0m09NGogXgV4wa9wkR8rRu4FAfKau6M31ipuwcLZhCDr nUsQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWXpxkH5JcSPNgTIqCcomXCY8JNRtTOK8JRlY8yJfeb/FCtb7vf9LWBlPoAfmeEDuDuikZH3TTwR0dVbms7X2k=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz08Nu/wNMcfXN1stxXLKFwKQfi9yoTlo3Q+xYGF/BtLELzHCUe rT6GRJQza47lLYO5V1H/LEN2jt4aR/NCTb7EH4uxc4VVCV7oSgsxxur7tF6HR2xNAd7IuWKc06v uHlDKpGYvEwGVXxBamgeEOR0jzcPOb90becM6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFNcoCk7uNgw4kCelpv+WrFi+oGmwSjkMRtcx9Fe9xdhuzJVEoyJKAuIOX4rHIISdQaN6rsqhtRwfuiRzJIjLE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:4015:b0:442:2c5f:d2f7 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-453742c6a7amr164208491cf.31.1724176596829; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMMESsyA1iPN7b1RhgW6ajFcG6m0f07Q072jxQn3q2729W3xzw@mail.gmail.com> <CABY-gONEaYj1nPG_QMQTQq7GfbTKT5piFgSJT5GZL=2FwhkVsA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESsx8MnWFXYuojygmU6qRG+kKnT-BOyea6cSnNd+MR2YA9w@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR11MB4692DA6A7F7D185E0CB93261DE8C2@DM6PR11MB4692.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4692DA6A7F7D185E0CB93261DE8C2@DM6PR11MB4692.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 12:56:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CACMsEX-H-zhn+a1gnGveXookFsdC-ymaNwEnvbTxzKWcVpurQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: VEVERJLYHCHLF6QUSGRDPMHCE5KLIW37
X-Message-ID-Hash: VEVERJLYHCHLF6QUSGRDPMHCE5KLIW37
X-MailFrom: buraglio@forwardingplane.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spring.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, "draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security@ietf.org" <draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security (ends Aug/19)
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG (SPRING)" <spring.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/vYBZ1gVLOLF0zLlAl1Ui8Jb0RwI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spring-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spring-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spring-leave@ietf.org>

Thanks Zafar. The authors will follow the recommendations of the
chairs and the consensus of the group for the document type. For now,
unless there is a clear directive, we can leave the intended status
as-is and adjust it accordingly.

nb

On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 12:04 PM Zafar Ali (zali) <zali@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alvaro, Bruno, Joel, WG, and authors,
>
>
>
> I support the adoption call.
>
> However, I believe the document should be “informational.”
>
>
>
> I have a comment on the section 7.1.1:
>
> The Section is not specific to SRv6 compression (CSID draft).
>
> RFC 8754 and RFC 8986 define reduced SRH, i.e., SRH MAY be omitted when the SRv6 Policy only contains one segment (typical for VPN Cases without TE).
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Regards … Zafar
>
>
>
> From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, August 8, 2024 at 11:47 AM
> To: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
> Cc: draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security@ietf.org <draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security@ietf.org>, spring-chairs@ietf.org <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
> Subject: [spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security (ends Aug/19)
>
> On August 7, 2024 at 3:07:12 PM, Yingzhen Qu wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> > The current intended status of this document is "Standards Track", is this
> > intentional?
>
> Yes, it is.  The document is intended to be a "companion" to the
> existing documents.
>
> However, the status is not "written in stone": it can be changed if
> the WG decides it should be something else.  Do you have thoughts
> about that?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro.
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to spring-leave@ietf.org

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status