Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call
Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 03 January 2020 19:58 UTC
Return-Path: <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F8C1200A4 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:58:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBu6gUg2KBVS for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:58:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA471200A3 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:58:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id x17so19398003pln.1 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 11:58:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=4egh90syFWXXIEJ6w/rYoXtMpg+ZBAxotN/Gmjfbbb0=; b=eJpiUYRxVPHB79QPYsvf+akVm+QUsEqxOTh2/eBZKLSBD/8MP/7k/fv4Nck+rBgDjc bpKKTU5vPM14FFHnCaTo5aBoKPbI2odEKagt60BD3r/F4ReASsigGoEbjTk0xVShESE4 1HaSp8vFEDQkuX83SCBF8Ko+n9y9cctzTbenwbsDfrG12wehzDMM5dO6eYuezk8bK/B8 a2o/HnEek7bEE7IvviE3mqZb72wCk3A6/sC9UpGAVfPKb/ZzqgFl5+g7h0dqgc4zK25t gsIU85ZRYB2AqI5wXkuIv7S7T8veIMUj8hVsdtKCsjuuTkHgag2MVSkTBVxsQqVmcVdR Pcig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=4egh90syFWXXIEJ6w/rYoXtMpg+ZBAxotN/Gmjfbbb0=; b=mN2a/halXOEYP/DEIKirBpeqQenH5cNSdzE9NcWNtMGPsI4RHvE3Ugpr09pu2M7lFV l7AwvDr/N+e044CSD6SdOeeuvsD4Ugg6ZDe7j75OM7rb9cEylSpLpJ2cwqUIa6TA5g7E dbw7PDLsc5NreTNgy1yjDyBLv98p2dFEzRDhPFdxivu5H2NSyADfB0aeAIlANZEqQvHK gcijbGpsobukJCNOv2kmu2MLxKBPXDtRG4A63zbCF+xIRzRM+6eQuzIjMKXFPutRxM2Z sfgnjYlefl2O0okZbyIDLfkJW3qxy0/7T61xEgM+olif1sXVZ1DU0G+DnUhH8tAbpxED h84A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX17CfEyaZWCySHN+GmPNMilKt43PmYS6HLciVhWG5CqUt/4oIb IkpvRRoGV1AIh3DjYoax+TSWNIRf
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx+wAwLRY5rA/lKidqtJBOb6YA7q/ajWydST1xWpOdh8diLoRhSNl+2jsuzCmuz3eOO8IQTZQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:302:: with SMTP id 2mr26085971pld.58.1578081529064; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 11:58:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2607:fb90:9c21:61a7:3107:971a:c518:8920? ([2607:fb90:9c21:61a7:3107:971a:c518:8920]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j14sm62610952pgs.57.2020.01.03.11.58.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Jan 2020 11:58:48 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-7E8EEE94-8D19-44E1-96DE-7488BBB9199D"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 11:58:47 -0800
Message-Id: <8A68486A-0C3D-4BA6-8083-651258530263@gmail.com>
References: <18437_1576774434_5DFBAB22_18437_317_31_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48D392D1@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <18437_1576774434_5DFBAB22_18437_317_31_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48D392D1@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: bruno.decraene@orange.com
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A878)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/vmbpFSFclKM0Ohoq58PxHZSGwug>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:58:54 -0000
Support Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 19, 2019, at 8:54 AM, bruno.decraene@orange.com wrote: > > > Hi SPRING WG, > > This begins a 2 week Early Allocation call for a “Ethernet” value from the "Protocol Numbers" registry. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-07#section-9.1 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-07#section-5.3 > https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml > > In parallel of the Working Group Last Call which is currently running, the authors are requesting for early code point allocation from IANA as implementations are under way. > > The criteria for early allocation are: > a. The code points must be from a space designated as "RFC > Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action". Additionally, > requests for early assignment of code points from a > "Specification Required" registry are allowed if the > specification will be published as an RFC. > > b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to > handling the protocol entities defined by the code points > (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described > in an Internet-Draft. > > c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if > there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later > specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. > > d. The Working Group chairs and Area Directors (ADs) judge that > there is sufficient interest in the community for early (pre-RFC) > implementation and deployment, or that failure to make an early > allocation might lead to contention for the code point in the > field. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7120#section-2 > > I believe the above conditions are met. (minus the AD judgement which is further down in the process) > > As a reminder, this topic has mainly been discussed following IETF 105 (Montréal) both during the meeting and on the mailing list. > During IETF 106 it has been discussed in the IntArea WG. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/proceedings#intarea > > Note that this code point is not to be specific to SRv6. Depending on AD guidance, this specific code point even be moved from draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming into a specific 1 page draft. > > If you support early adoption, please include “support” along with any comments about the draft’s technical solution. > > If you do not support early allocation, please include “no support” in your email and indicate why. > > Thank you, > --Bruno > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Dirk Steinberg
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Ahmed Bashandy
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Kamran Raza (skraza)
- [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programmi… bruno.decraene
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Francois Clad (fclad)
- [spring] 答复: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Lizhenbin
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Huzhibo
- Re: [spring] 答复: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-p… Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Mach Chen
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… James Guichard
- [spring] FW: RE: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-p… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… john leddy.net
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Gaurav Dawra
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Satoru Matsushima
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Ahmed Abdelsalam (ahabdels)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… stefano previdi
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Bernier, Daniel
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… bruno.decraene
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… bruno.decraene
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… Loa Andersson
- Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-progr… bruno.decraene