Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8200 (Was Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping))

[Robert Raszuk <[e-mail]>]

> I would have to question your understanding of the term "end to end"
> if you're make such an assertion.
>

My description of end to end purity of IPv6 is based on Fernando's
comments. In his view if packet gets encapsulated with an arbitrary header
and if that header changes hop by hop end to end property of IPv6 is
violated.

NAT breaks end-to-end.
>

Of course ... and I would agree with that. But if so this entire discussion
of quote "violation of Internet Standard" just because outer header changes
is pure waist of time.

And I think it would be best for those from 6man who understand what IPv6
end to end is to chim in and comment on such emails like we have seen
earlier today.

Many thx,
R.