Re: [spring] 64-bit locators
Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Thu, 19 December 2019 21:57 UTC
Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9354120180 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:57:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K4mnGnytX2zf for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:57:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B5541200CC for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:57:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id b10so7345140iof.11 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:57:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bY/mcsBQZgu2pzvujwmCqXlTXcTR7qbVIA6a0NRUbKo=; b=kz74Qm+/rTviMVtf7hoj4qLoZ5dA+nl3sHyUSfAQGMz9nJtstVVphUr+xZ67dkbKMY M9T+uWIpjJBb/EstGRQos0skvt4WLSu6YVd/9DlRppAyx+47f9w+7BYNPc1B0gyk4z0x 4i3/ZfEB+9E6S3zxOU0/lPx7S49jxYr3lOJHTD5gO/RaCX2+QjUFB9eHoPcWttmzSK4u fHT4VdliUZYBSrGxMrZJvOno75ZrBSxWnnGUs2DCtTq2CvUI2UmrMAanUL7UZ7ljEDQ3 H120oNl0pXqZs5re5uMCmvSrg2seaYjnVWh3m3DJahzAo91E77Cm8oy1gFddLlf0T4fs oD1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bY/mcsBQZgu2pzvujwmCqXlTXcTR7qbVIA6a0NRUbKo=; b=FdzD6zE1LX3ky/kCRyoLXghihNLpl5g8xo54pGfg9d0XZrwoEsV2rKI1K/k8wo8EEL loHeQDhh9fDk8GZIEP6iriB91YrValXWtm2iQS0z6MZQzlVn25eo8yO+Tapqsd47sxVn VxRbubvhoZTD7hytfebwwUbYd+jQMpAIGCPVq8m2BN9FIjn0RuQbl9kUyb5izeB8nS+U q966CiLTQZLUc1AQvi2R7qoYydeICCnrfIng144BVPB5+oCMvdID9wysSBSIL2Fkfadf x0AMB69mWsSgyyJtBGmyf2J9JKCkojQZnJ9X2YN9DbDYkDy0p9hUo2GcXgJP4dfpPeva 9ZuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU3Nl2EXN941yA3E9DgIM9COQ7N2i7fRF2KaRxzuVcnNJiSppnE 3rCYuG+udVS96Nk0H7UUxhLQjMPUE2PBsLRAFbk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwa2NN5HL5MYBxUI/TPDbaQIt0RopNWkCAkbCYoWsT0F41f+iIfA7tgGKXbk5elGhIuc/U0ckLSyDWWz8k8PVI=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c9ca:: with SMTP id z193mr7367664iof.276.1576792666725; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:57:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN7PR05MB5699D85CC99CB23B1B573901AE530@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAO42Z2yAH4ECeB+PGRS98HgZHXtTq3iX1x6aMSPjKgS6O1GDAQ@mail.gmail.com> <8f5607c9-645a-ea88-e2a7-a4bed8206fc8@gmail.com> <63F5AA66-AEF8-4278-B98C-D3C53AC5A60A@cisco.com> <CAO42Z2x-5NUYHAzjBAR3je7EoPde=-autOXyta5EvqDydbVMWA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2x-5NUYHAzjBAR3je7EoPde=-autOXyta5EvqDydbVMWA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:57:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CABNhwV1xZEx6_eZpdgvWAmiopXT-SACR1DM_KSeF_JSDvgSSOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c8dfcd059a15a6fc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/x6UuBsfA9OR6dVkShaqatzVS9R4>
Subject: Re: [spring] 64-bit locators
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 21:57:51 -0000
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 4:17 PM Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, 22:48 Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril), <pcamaril@cisco.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As mentioned in the draft, the choice of the locator length is deployment >> specific. >> LINE has deployed SRv6 using a locator different than a /64. >> > > This is effectively an appeal to authority. > > What makes what LINE has done the best and right thing to do? > > I can already see they're using the IPv4 link-local 169.254/16 prefix in a > manner that wildly violates how it is specified to be used in RFC3927. See > Slides 9, 12, 24. > > Tying your IPv6 addressing plan to IPv4 addressing could end up imposing > IPv4's addressing limitations on IPv6 - defeating the primary purpose of > IPv6 - providing many more addresses than IPv4. > > Slide 32 shows they're violating RFC 4193 (IPv6 ULAs), because they're > using ULA-Cs ('fc') rather than ULA-Ls ('fd'), despite there being no > central registry. Their 40 bit Global ID of "17" could be random, although > I'm guessing not, as random numbers would usually have far less zeros in > them. These sorts of ULA errors are why I presented "Getting IPv6 > Addressing Right" at AusNOG this year - > https://www.slideshare.net/markzzzsmith/ausnog-2019-getting-ipv6-private-addressing-right > . > > > This is an Internet Draft, so this is the best time to make these sorts of > changes, as it is much easier now. When things become RFCs it becomes much > harder (and much, much harder when they become Internet Standards). > > If somebody has deployed Internet Draft level technology, they have to > accept the risk that what they've deployed might not comply with the > eventual RFC. > > Regards, > Mark. > [Gyan] For IPv6 addressing you can have any length prefix up to /128. i am all for flexibility with vlsm even though may not be widely used. SRv6 SID encoding differs in that we had 3 fields {locator;function;arguments} that I think it makes sense to be fixed in the specification as Ron has brought up. >From an operator perspective for programmability as SRv6 deployments with or without centralized controller, fixed length of the 3 fields makes sense so operators can easily craft ACLs for deployments. I think we could go crazy with the sizing but I think since 64 bit boundary exists today for slaac we could make the locator /64 as well is fine. We could split the other 2 fields evenly 32 bits each or make the function longer. I think we’ll defined sizing is important so SID addressing plan is not chaotic. > > > >> Cheers, >> Pablo. >> >> [1] >> https://speakerdeck.com/line_developers/line-data-center-networking-with-srv6 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Alexandre Petrescu < >> alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> >> Date: Thursday, 19 December 2019 at 09:44 >> To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org> >> Subject: Re: [spring] 64-bit locators >> >> >> >> Le 19/12/2019 à 00:13, Mark Smith a écrit : >> [...] >> >> > VLSM [variable length subnet mask] is fundamentally hard, >> >> We need VLSM in other places too, such as in ULA prefixes fd and fc. >> >> I think it is indeed a difficult to grasp concept, but it is there >> for >> growth. >> >> Alex >> >> > >> > Regards, >> > Mark. >> > >> > __ >> > >> > In this case, we should probably change the document to reflect >> > implemented behavior.____ >> > >> > __ __ >> > >> > >> > >> Ron____ >> > >> > __ __ >> > >> > >> > Juniper Business Use Only >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > spring mailing list >> > spring@ietf.org <mailto:spring@ietf.org> >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > spring mailing list >> > spring@ietf.org >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spring mailing list >> spring@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spring mailing list >> spring@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >> > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > -- Gyan S. Mishra IT Network Engineering & Technology Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) 13101 Columbia Pike FDC1 3rd Floor Silver Spring, MD 20904 United States Phone: 301 502-1347 Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com www.linkedin.com/in/networking-technologies-consultant
- [spring] 64-bit locators Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Miya Kohno
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Miya Kohno
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Miya Kohno
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] 64-bit locators Erik Kline