Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Wed, 26 February 2020 20:10 UTC

To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Sander Steffann <sander@retevia.net>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <7B51F0BE-CE40-42B8-9D87-0B764B6E00C5@steffann.nl> <47B4D89B-D752-4F4C-8226-41FCB0A610F0@retevia.net> <CAOj+MMGYtGOi2n_E57TTfD_3kWvkqWGWhhfev4Z2GVwJD5oSnQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <e0fb41cc-b830-3c72-c03d-591f9ff0722b@si6networks.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:09:47 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMGYtGOi2n_E57TTfD_3kWvkqWGWhhfev4Z2GVwJD5oSnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/y2R1gII7DbXWbnvT1iwGZ97tdZw>
Subject: Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea
Precedence: list

On 26/2/20 16:44, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Hey Sander,
> 
> No worries ... three IPv6 musketeers have already presented themselves 
> well to this discussion. This was just one more demo of it. No need to 
> apologize - at least me :)
> 
> And while you can call someone's opinion the way you like - the fact 
> that SRv6 builds on top of IPv6 does not make it automatically IPv6 
> extension.
> 
> My perhaps subtle point was that while politically it has been sold like 
> minor IPv6 extension from technical point it does not need to be 
> positioned like one. The sole fact that it reuses the same ethertype 
> does not make it an extension.

Yeah, it's not an extension: it's a major surgery to IPv6, and a major 
change to the IPv6 architecture (nobody would even call it "IPv6 
maintenance").

A number of us wonder how many milliseconds it would have taken for this 
proposal to be shot down if it wasn't being pushed by a big vendor.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

[spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea David Allan I
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Voyer, Daniel
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea David Allan I
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Gyan Mishra
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Ron Bonica
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Huzhibo
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Chengli (Cheng Li)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
[spring] Fw: Re: Is srv6 PSP a good idea licong@chinatelecom.cn
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea James Guichard
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Andrew Alston
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Andrew Alston
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Dirk Steinberg
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Dirk Steinberg
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Joel M. Halpern
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Tom Herbert
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Dirk Steinberg
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea john leddy.net
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea john leddy.net
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
[spring] A permanent change to/violation of RFC82… Mark Smith
Re: [spring] A permanent change to/violation of R… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Darren Dukes (ddukes)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
Re: [spring] A permanent change to/violation of R… Mark Smith
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Voyer, Daniel
Re: [spring] A permanent change to/violation of R… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith