From nobody Thu Nov 12 18:50:36 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F883A13AF; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:50:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.087 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UJ0FyR6X06Az; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:50:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4F713A130B; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:50:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id d17so2321429plr.5; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:50:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fV9mb83M+LfikOtYyczT1K+ivl/NzoEMKl2UEfBETCc=; b=WESPtGypy2gzlfab8EyAFo/EpUIfzx1Pud9MnqVBSuBT/cIzrAdlMUZpsCiRlbFhaJ XWTD90sF+0bbyKSTmH9j16xmsqgFykF8W1Ej1ujnisbQvBulIaJnq8/Ocw6xxPzSUBCS a9JJt7HLa/BO8EbFdpFkQzbeM/OobT3WEzZ2t2OSvpYTjaB/4m3FSzWTeZ7/fXkRf97S VMG0znmINJCuEjuB9uN4jiXVHYYbcTY/SXkM8RUsAkZRwIo6xr0DA5Id3e4P9cx3MVfH 1ELoZchyHuKjG3o1+lOM0fxzCM5tlUvW9nObwcNP8QOG9hD8OpazVfUaD4PrdmpbRmLP RwdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fV9mb83M+LfikOtYyczT1K+ivl/NzoEMKl2UEfBETCc=; b=dIhc1wKysP7flBzeFIv8NPbQzW6cDFpfYJCOGbNPhTMKS0wy/3LiIQs+B32EHGykMT BvYhMQyTpxDiCAFpZKQBX+xyqINuWH2QtGS30GNWPe27yptv//7fzpyeAiu2v/6kZb/9 fcjY9bxlTkauNcX0YS3t7hOPJQC5hF0Wd4EA5PrvPyEl3gH7qa+3LJBN4slhnW4zAPAW xDtyOOZ/iYYAuwvo7k+mQEtMdiWmuP1hrMNx+7yz0eqIIgxV2Py/k8m1KGkQmskrOIlB UXj29J+VFeNaBbybCF+Ckn0hHUNWjUXwsr31XYlU7Qb2zxx3H6+cJqMVMaVVCwcYwg7v rLcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532DDtpI1ixA6yQVKrT1asa0DyW326n0bqwV4qjt+tNlZJ+w7Vmh nDho/jaCeNdUt6/Oqzquzv142y8vppQ+pDjJO00j1RrpxRdCGA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdOpY3sINHKFlO+XIF822dqlmWBuFYenAzHUYlaDbNIoM08Qs/S1VjU2sv8n1nY03XEG8//H7gxu7KR8yDFjk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bc83:b029:d6:ab18:1079 with SMTP id bb3-20020a170902bc83b02900d6ab181079mr332693plb.22.1605235829048; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:50:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <00dc01d6b8f5$b07b57a0$117206e0$@chinatelecom.cn> In-Reply-To: <00dc01d6b8f5$b07b57a0$117206e0$@chinatelecom.cn> From: Gyan Mishra Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:50:18 -0500 Message-ID: To: zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn Cc: James Guichard , spring@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005f0ba805b3f417a8" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [spring] =?utf-8?b?5Zue5aSNOiBXRyBBZG9wdGlvbiBDYWxsIGZvciBkcmFm?= =?utf-8?q?t-li-spring-srv6-path-segment?= X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:50:34 -0000 --0000000000005f0ba805b3f417a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I support WG adoption. This is an important draft for binding bidirectional paths for PCE and PM and possibly other cases. I noticed this draft which seems to be identical defining this new SRv6 path segment. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-6man-srv6-path-segment-encap-04 Thanks Gyan On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 8:14 AM wrote: > It=E2=80=99s useful for us to deploy SR Protection. Support. Thanks. > > B.R. > > Zhu Yongqing > > > > *=E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA:* spring *=E4=BB= =A3=E8=A1=A8 *James Guichard > *=E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4:* 2020=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=884=E6=97= =A5 1:39 > > *=E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA:* spring@ietf.org > *=E6=8A=84=E9=80=81:* spring-chairs@ietf.org > *=E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98:* [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-spring-srv6-= path-segment > > > > Dear WG: > > > > This message starts a 3 week WG adoption call for > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment-07, ending > November 24th 2020. Please note that this document has several changes > from v-06 that were requested by the SPRING chairs. For this reason, the > chairs have extended the adoption call for an additional week to allow th= e > WG enough time to review these changes before deciding on WG adoption. > > > > After review of the document please indicate support (or not) for WG > adoption to the mailing list. Please also provide comments/reasons for th= at > support (or lack thereof) as silence will not be considered as consent. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Jim, Bruno & Joel > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > --=20 *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD --0000000000005f0ba805b3f417a8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I support WG adoption.

This is an important draft for binding bidi= rectional paths for PCE and PM and possibly other cases.

I noticed this draft which seems to be ide= ntical defining this new SRv6 path segment.

Gyan

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 8:14 AM <= zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn> wr= ote:

It=E2=80=99s useful for us to deploy SR Protection. Support. Thanks.

B.R.

Zhu Yongqing

=C2=A0

=E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> =E4=BB=A3=E8=A1=A8 James Guichard
=E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: 2020=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=884= =E6=97=A5 1:39

=E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: spring@ietf.org
=E6=8A=84=E9=80=81: = spring-chairs@ietf.org
=E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: [sp= ring] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment=

=C2=A0

Dear WG:=

=C2=A0=

This message = starts a 3 week WG adoption call for https://tools.ietf= .org/html/draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment-07, ending November 24= th 2020. Please note that this document has several changes from v-06= that were requested by the SPRING chairs. For this reason, the chairs have= extended the adoption call for an additional week to allow the WG enough t= ime to review these changes before deciding on WG adoption. <= /span>

=C2=A0<= /span>

After review of the d= ocument please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption to the mailing lis= t. Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack thereof) = as silence will not be considered as consent.

=C2=A0

Thanks!

=C2=A0

Jim, Bruno & Joel=

=C2=A0=

=C2=A0=

=C2=A0=

=C2=A0=

=C2=A0=

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
--
--0000000000005f0ba805b3f417a8--