[Spud] 答复: Numbers...
Youjianjie <youjianjie@huawei.com> Fri, 12 June 2015 09:49 UTC
Return-Path: <youjianjie@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD8F1A8A87
for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 02:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id EycM41d4GTkc for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 02:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35C271A8ADE
for <spud@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 02:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com)
([172.18.7.190])
by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued)
with ESMTP id BXH40179; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:49:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.37) by
lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:49:02 +0100
Received: from NKGEML509-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.68]) by
nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001;
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:48:56 +0800
From: Youjianjie <youjianjie@huawei.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?TWlyamEgS8O8aGxld2luZA==?= <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>,
Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Spud] Numbers...
Thread-Index: AQHQZveT5lJPfkOmdkOe80G8x/ARcZ0sob4AgHx3muA=
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:48:55 +0000
Message-ID: <F6C28B32DA084644BB6C8D0BD65B669D18AE61@nkgeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <5512AA84.80107@gmail.com>
<7276B84D-7540-4DFC-82EC-1246EF96EFF0@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <7276B84D-7540-4DFC-82EC-1246EF96EFF0@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.173]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/6-VfH9nHEWSXsU0Y1yTdrwYv23U>
Cc: "spud@ietf.org" <spud@ietf.org>
Subject: [Spud] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiAgTnVtYmVycy4uLg==?=
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>,
<mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>,
<mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:49:07 -0000
Hi, I'm also confused about the following description: "Today UDP is often blocked (“99% of UDP is garbage”) but volume of (good) UDP traffic grows, e.g. RTCWEB uses UDP for data and media" What kind of UDP is called garbage? Why UDP is often blocked? Could somebody please explain? Thanks, Jianjie > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Spud [mailto:spud-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Mirja Kühlewind > 发送时间: 2015年3月25日 20:55 > 收件人: Martin Stiemerling > 抄送: spud@ietf.org > 主题: Re: [Spud] Numbers... > > Hi Martin, > > this sentence is in quotes because that’s stuff people did actually say to me or > others. 99% is not true but there are currently no number publicly available to > our knowledge. We just started measurements on this and we are also > currently talking to people who might have some numbers e.g. for > chrome/QUIC (that’s part of the hops activity). > > Mirja > > > > Am 25.03.2015 um 07:31 schrieb Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>om>: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I am just going through the slides for today's BOF and just got stuck on slide 5 > of which says: > > "Today UDP is often blocked (“99% of UDP is garbage”) but volume of > > (good) UDP traffic grows, e.g. RTCWEB uses UDP for data and media" > > > > Is there reliable data that underscores UDP is often blocked? > > > > I can see cases, e.g., enterprises where this is true, but in most other > settings my UDP traffic is just making it to the other end, by today. Was > different a couple of years ago, when there was no stateful filtering of UDP > traffic implemented. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Spud mailing list > > Spud@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud > > _______________________________________________ > Spud mailing list > Spud@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud
- [Spud] Numbers... Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [Spud] Numbers... Mirja Kühlewind
- [Spud] 答复: Numbers... Youjianjie
- Re: [Spud] 答复: Numbers... Mirja Kühlewind