Re: [Spud] SPUD for Datacenters

Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Mon, 30 March 2015 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2831A92AE for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 667olwkcmCI4 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E8091A9170 for <spud@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97BAD9374; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:24:12 +0200 (MEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gieTdpvxoCfO; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:24:12 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [10.21.66.96] (unknown [68.65.174.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mirjak) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61C31D931B; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:24:11 +0200 (MEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: =?utf-8?Q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <55142E8A.1000509@nexenta.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:24:07 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <39481497-0304-4B99-863B-BC78364FB59A@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <55142E8A.1000509@nexenta.com>
To: Caitlin Bestler <caitlin.bestler@nexenta.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/8YS4xyyIGeMWoR3PJMF5KLAnDiA>
Cc: spud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Spud] SPUD for Datacenters
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:24:17 -0000

Hi Caitlin,

just a quick response. To my experience designing thing for the Internet is usually harder that for data centers. However, what works in the Internet should usually also work in data centers. (If that’s the most efficient way to do things in a data center, is a different question). However, I think it is most important that we can come up with something that can be use in the Internet. And as this is today hard problem, I’d prefer to focus on this part.

Mirja

 
> Am 26.03.2015 um 09:06 schrieb Caitlin Bestler <caitlin.bestler@nexenta.com>om>:
> 
> Almost all of the SPUD discussion deals with long-haul networking, but virtually
> all of the infrormational declarations discussed would be just as applicable for
> datacenter switches, rbridges and routers.
> 
> This is especially important when you consider that the same application might be
> run either on a machine in a home network or on a virtual machine in a datacenter.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spud mailing list
> Spud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud