IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spud] Extensibility (wa New Version Notification for draft-hildebrand-spud-prototype-02.txt)

"Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com> Mon, 09 March 2015 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jhildebr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED951A9172 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJVNoqqL8Sg5 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2DCE1A8BB6 for <spud@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=990; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1425936430; x=1427146030; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=hrs9Z+XfRPGQ1Hs0MkAoWoz/0zZlFh/XghhrD4HGXb8=; b=Ae5lifTqukOV8r7PkfZrwMHrY17OOJtQNZdiSnJwl5FZqnNj971WkAQe jUKp41iSQyVZrIJoioZa+XXOksf0eiD1yCx8+b/8Gzut+ywDeszh+oyhJ eTqdvTTrWU/zWvqciAixFKnaK8rRwfmcwKb96hnsQWWYlHHWS76eEXTHs w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AHDQCBD/5U/4cNJK1cgwaBLASDBr0wiCYCHIEPTQEBAQEBAXyEEAEBBCMRQwIQAgEIGgImAgICMBUQAgQBDQUbiBSjTptnAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4EhiXaEOzMHAgKCZC+BFgEEkA+JU5N0I4IygTxvgUR/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,370,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="130361689"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2015 21:27:10 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t29LRA3H019974 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 9 Mar 2015 21:27:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.156]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:27:09 -0500
From: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
To: Szilveszter Nadas <Szilveszter.Nadas@ericsson.com>, Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [Spud] Extensibility (wa New Version Notification for draft-hildebrand-spud-prototype-02.txt)
Thread-Index: AQHQVqf4JQjwNdJnsku/AoeBVLSQCp0OudWAgADiFgCABQWagA==
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 21:27:09 +0000
Message-ID: <78608660-E8DC-4E59-914D-02C29F4F49B6@cisco.com>
References: <20150303155825.32731.37010.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <08728A73-ED15-4928-A5BB-A59EA9E6D785@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMDSMMUByAMOc8gSyMajyKj0ZtZzmFPg+J7bz-6AYkFYhw@mail.gmail.com> <AA3CFF6F-1037-495C-B533-A7EB95CF65DF@cisco.com> <7C6DFF6A-A653-486D-AA39-F8A5FDC0A661@ericsson.com> <76EFE5DD-86C1-476A-BC93-074ACA3A5C88@ericsson.com> <54F8B9A5.5000008@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <EA4C43BE752A194597B002779DF69BAE23CA0293@ESESSMB303.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <EA4C43BE752A194597B002779DF69BAE23CA0293@ESESSMB303.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/15.8.0.150225
x-originating-ip: [10.24.213.230]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B5CDF2C3AE0DE043B114032F7F7BD221@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/KHHyi2zVWy9dT9tAxnyLCmz3Stw>
Cc: "spud@ietf.org" <spud@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Spud] Extensibility (wa New Version Notification for draft-hildebrand-spud-prototype-02.txt)
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 21:27:15 -0000

On 3/6/15, 2:45 AM, "Szilveszter Nadas" <Szilveszter.Nadas@ericsson.com> wrote:

>A question related to this is in the back of my mind for a while. Shall SPUD standardize the minimum amount of common/necessary signaling information elements and allow any signaling solution, even proprietary, using SPUD to reach the middleboxes? Or shall SPUD include most of the information elements needed? I am in favor of the first, because that allows innovation, though clearly interop is much more a hassle. 

I mostly agree.  I want to make sure we get anything that *all* implementations need to support into the base spec.  Then we can move all of the other extensions into separate documents.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email