IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spud] SPUD meeting in Yokohama?

Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> Mon, 19 October 2015 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D271A1B1B for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_17=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LsI510dzuJK4 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D0461A1AFC for <spud@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1131; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445261423; x=1446471023; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=tj8/KZpHa5UR8FN+qTsiyL8gIHGLwovwUUAPMhr9xpA=; b=XNDATmoLgBr47KKAtRNHca+Y3oMgfDy3Ka15eHPRmj/zdl9fJwIcfTug n7P9a5sH2tPtLZ6vIlUdUaSeKyN7LLoVgWIySziE1aqxTl+bEnvHIUOG6 jBYpGo5taEYrh7ValDoQrR8MunNzYTx4tFzryObmMS/4Xmrb9vo0yFRoR g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D8AQAg8CRW/4sNJK1egzZUb74OAQ2BWhcKhX0CgTc4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQuAQEEAQEBNzQbCxgJJQ8FE0mIMA3DFQEBAQEBAQQBAQEBAQEBGASLdYUUF4QXBY4HiByNFQiBWIQ8jTuISR8BAUKCER2BdR40hWcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,702,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="42725916"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Oct 2015 13:30:22 +0000
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (mcast-linux1.cisco.com [172.27.244.121]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9JDUMiO029301 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <spud@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:30:22 GMT
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t9JDULVg031768 for <spud@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:30:21 -0700
Received: (from eckert@localhost) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id t9JDULMF031767 for spud@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:30:21 -0700
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:30:21 -0700
From: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
To: spud@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20151019133021.GI14847@cisco.com>
References: <CALx6S34TqTt83W4YwO7J4nb1+smQX9DYChu4=VAOF4Zi9GuYug@mail.gmail.com> <A2DC538D-D710-4AAE-BB30-5FCCFE40E42D@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A2DC538D-D710-4AAE-BB30-5FCCFE40E42D@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/MyZkVfhlbgbs023nb16DR9lYUsc>
Subject: Re: [Spud] SPUD meeting in Yokohama?
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:30:24 -0000

An update would be nice, in whatever form during IETF week.

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:41:44AM +0200, Mirja K?hlewind wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> we are currently working on updating the spud regs doc based on the questions/discussions we had. We did not plan for a meeting at the moment but if there is interest in discussing the reqs or anything else, we can for sure set up a side meeting. Please let me know if there is any interest by anybody in a meeting!
> 
> The reason why we are currently not pushing this too much is that we do not plan for a BoF in Yokohama nor Buenos Aires. 
> 
> Mirja
> 
> 
> > Am 14.10.2015 um 21:17 schrieb Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>om>:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Will there be a SPUD meeting of some sort in Yokohama?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spud mailing list
> > Spud@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spud mailing list
> Spud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud

-- 
---
Toerless Eckert, eckert@cisco.com

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email