IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Spud] discovery

Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Thu, 19 March 2015 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291731A1A0C for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3P3si4JQyjVG for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7B361A037B for <spud@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igcau2 with SMTP id au2so97542191igc.0 for <spud@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4wPNhyphrF97LvBuSe9etrnekskZ5phq+oqRi8h2UBY=; b=NCkxtzoE8IcxPGAPc//0i+g65c3ujGAxOcXvouBYn0GtEwsxQSvp0qyfvdi48kby/Z 4wO1DtayHDEnbsCVJTr2xdcGPIXi/aEIkkbuR69coNBBNgqnw0EIsYn2F8lXOv+BS0fH ZQeBsqpf8QNKcBcFn/VI759fsfdfJ1eDFE/1kxW7ZAesWs/JQhZll/ipK0WPp/we95Rx 8CU2N9UAWUoayvz4imLoKf9HzyJCDDr/uB2360JunVz2uz8MRRTvXEwJwUJCIXo7DJvB CbBjRS8Qi3vfHi59c0wur0pNJbu87QoP2pXZd1XFk5sg92dg01yY1eBi+4Ov8nvbIBG5 KdzQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.88.205 with SMTP id d13mr103193225icm.16.1426780091287; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.113.196 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:48:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD62q9V8wg6YrTVmg4px=sBdXZyEYZE0iAUd6mJfmgJnDLEMmg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: "spud@ietf.org" <spud@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba614c26838e4a0511a6202f
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/Pgm1ovgUVegoPyMPjJA6x7kaBHk>
Subject: [Spud] discovery
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:48:13 -0000

The draft doesn't say much about how one efficiently determines whether the
other end is SPUD-capable so that an application can know whether it can
use it.  Has anyone given thought to this?

--aaron

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email