Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?!
Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Fri, 14 August 2015 07:40 UTC
Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F491A0277
for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, PLING_QUERY=0.994,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id NQ7UHd0lYllf for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de
[IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A120E1A03A6
for <spud@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] (p508F1ACB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.143.26.203])
(Authenticated sender: macmic)
by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CD31C0B461E;
Fri, 14 Aug 2015 09:39:59 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <20150814070411.GQ1667@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 09:39:57 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <07E2D217-F71A-47DD-850D-F6F21855FBC1@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <20150814070411.GQ1667@cisco.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/Qfjda5CxDB2FNX5WbGvShe-OqPY>
Cc: spud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?!
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>,
<mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>,
<mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 07:40:04 -0000
> On 14 Aug 2015, at 09:04, Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> wrote: > > Was there ever an extension for TCP or SCTP to "explicitly" deal with > anycast, eg: SYN to reponder anycast, SYN-ACK back from responder > unicast, but with data field indicating anycast address and nonce from > SYN, then ACK back to responder unicast ? You can do that with SCTP and dynamic address re-conifguration. Randy Stewart and myself discussed this ages ago but never wrote an ID, since we didn't see a consumer of the idea. Best regards Michael > > I can't remember / find anything like this right now. WOuld be > lovely for SPUD to consier including something like this. Heck, > could even do this with multicast and let initiator send ACK > back to fastest responder ;-) > > Cheers > Toerless > > _______________________________________________ > Spud mailing list > Spud@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud >
- [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Michael Tuexen
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Michael Tuexen
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Michael Thornburgh
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Michael Thornburgh