IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Spud] Numbers...

Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 25 March 2015 12:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E83E1ACE46 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cwR_gC6DRwYH for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647C31AC425 for <spud@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibbg6 with SMTP id bg6so21667904wib.0 for <spud@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CDxcOA/alm7thLTMV8AXpJJpUqImEVEdoEt3TXEYRpc=; b=JDBCCmwvSFJFBK8zbM1Vt5xSNKUoScVhPkM2K5QzQYfm/ynhT5FUcJ+APeh1mCLrfi uYrg0F+4N4AnxJRzCcafcPudqsOA9JAp5haCDZPj5IATVhUtx3fP724KXn0Sn4HaSY3Z PJwSkbqnM9+PvYuLH52WTjL7rD24WmYLRHUMxjMOuxG5X9us+7WjVLmP0yZLw253jhWD txxEmEilp7BXeLprhkiph23YZTh+pK38JICFEA1x34Vnbj//krTfa6Zjkjtgt4xkItyd 0n6lh08cnMOT7y1qwjigTVm/x/hE4vzP/ASRLehW23eQNFsHZdGzZUgI6z/XbmrmdS5J fFaA==
X-Received: by 10.194.156.133 with SMTP id we5mr17916454wjb.37.1427286662136; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-9c7e.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:152:78ac:1619:194c:ae22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n6sm3509799wjy.8.2015.03.25.05.31.00 for <spud@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5512AA84.80107@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:31:00 -0500
From: Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: spud@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/SJRv9R-ZzRcwXbfU-OBux4T6irs>
Subject: [Spud] Numbers...
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:31:04 -0000

Hi all,

I am just going through the slides for today's BOF and just got stuck on 
slide 5 of which says:
"Today UDP is often blocked (“99% of UDP is garbage”) but volume of
(good) UDP traffic grows, e.g. RTCWEB uses UDP for data and media"

Is there reliable data that underscores UDP is often blocked?

I can see cases, e.g., enterprises where this is true, but in most other 
settings my UDP traffic is just making it to the other end, by today. 
Was different a couple of years ago, when there was no stateful 
filtering of UDP traffic implemented.

Thanks,

   Martin

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email