IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spud] FW: New Version Notification for draft-hildebrand-spud-prototype-02.txt

"Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com> Tue, 03 March 2015 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jhildebr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A671A1A33 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:00:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9xj6C4-WU-vg for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 686EC1A879F for <spud@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:00:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=924; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1425409244; x=1426618844; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=M0IL9oDpPVdpcB9lQs9vF5to8qT5FV6cP51b7ZKIqcc=; b=Oy0I3iGOVmQgkhdUFjX24cE/mL86DIRMOKLTNz7qSoVyWt+nl/4X7pNF j+DpK+i22E0eWCON34YZtbzfoNWbQlcrShvGF4iVDrKRPjGG2P5A4Fh5X g+gA+v4gD3Y8kefKV8wq6XvxccOcNsk7q0ibhAz6wBEtnSSudeIPuB0Sw g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DsBgAJBPZU/49dJa1agwKBLASDB7wNiCACHIEMTQEBAQEBAXyEEAEBBCMRPgUCEAIBCBoCJgICAh8RFQcJAgQOBYgbAxG8ApUDDYUeAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4EhiXGCRIF3MweCaC+BFAEEj3mIAYFIjVOGDCOBfx8UgTxvgUR/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,682,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="400555727"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2015 19:00:43 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com [173.36.12.76]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t23J0hrW003812 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 19:00:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.156]) by xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com ([173.36.12.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 13:00:43 -0600
From: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Spud] FW: New Version Notification for draft-hildebrand-spud-prototype-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQVcrn/YYxcKCBL0m1gYXxY+ydN50LX98AgAAYvoCAABF6AP//9KoAgAATsYA=
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 19:00:43 +0000
Message-ID: <82FC66A7-1CD1-4271-955E-0586C6853457@cisco.com>
References: <20150303155825.32731.37010.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <08728A73-ED15-4928-A5BB-A59EA9E6D785@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMDSMMUByAMOc8gSyMajyKj0ZtZzmFPg+J7bz-6AYkFYhw@mail.gmail.com> <AA3CFF6F-1037-495C-B533-A7EB95CF65DF@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMADSkbcsU5b03h_Ri-PMirtbDY94LAq_P5UjKW5GUrPiQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMADSkbcsU5b03h_Ri-PMirtbDY94LAq_P5UjKW5GUrPiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/15.8.0.150225
x-originating-ip: [10.61.175.73]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <90B4D49AEAAD9545A2C7C32144590A63@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/X-eb8ic9PxaMZQTfjJZxyJ6caW4>
Cc: "spud@ietf.org" <spud@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Spud] FW: New Version Notification for draft-hildebrand-spud-prototype-02.txt
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 19:00:59 -0000

On 3/3/15, 7:50 PM, "Ted Hardie" <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>​I don't think it is enough, because you still need to disambiguate flows that go between the same endpoints but are different tubes.  The explicit identifiers allow you to make statements about their relationships more easily (think about the ordinal ranking
> use case, where a video app wants to say "this thumbnail flow is more important than the full-resolution flow")
>
>​These aren't the bytes to save, in my opinion.

Although in TCP we currently use different source ports for different sockets, I'm happy to agree with you until/unless we learn something new.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email