Re: [Spud] on trust and lying
Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu> Wed, 25 March 2015 19:53 UTC
Return-Path: <roland.bless@kit.edu>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A001D1B2B66
for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3]
autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id vYxQJ8E4jc_Y for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de
[141.3.10.81])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD54A1B2B65
for <spud@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i72vorta.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.71.26]
helo=i72vorta.tm.kit.edu)
by iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp port 25
iface 141.3.10.81 id 1YarMV-0006Xb-D5
for <spud@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:53:11 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by i72vorta.tm.kit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11DEAB002B8
for <spud@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:53:10 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <55131225.6040609@kit.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:53:09 +0100
From: Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu>
Organization: Institute of Telematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: spud@ietf.org
References: <551304ED.7080601@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <551304ED.7080601@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-Timestamp: iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de 1427313191.
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/XVE2tJLlRgIHjUwynjF5FUh9z7w>
Subject: Re: [Spud] on trust and lying
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>,
<mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>,
<mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:53:14 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Eliot Lear wrote: > Whatever SPUD becomes, it has to establish, at the very least, that > implicit behavior contract for UDP. Today it simply doesn't exist > in the general sense, although there are may be a higher few > protocols that allow for that. Especially for future protocols, the middleboxes have to believe/trust on the information given in the SPUD encapsulation, since they may not be able to check what the protocol is actually doing inside due to encryption. Regards, Roland -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlUTEiUACgkQ1YyfLd659keyzgCg5OD70mR11FirBuErRNEuMCac fVcAoPMt0wEziQbvkuwHn24tqaRXr0O8 =0NN3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Spud] on trust and lying Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spud] on trust and lying Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [Spud] on trust and lying Roland Bless
- Re: [Spud] on trust and lying Bob Briscoe