IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spud] Extensibility (wa New Version Notification for draft-hildebrand-spud-prototype-02.txt)

Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Thu, 05 March 2015 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8865B1A8991 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:16:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GfA3dPMUgn-8 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:16:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D7A1A8949 for <spud@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:16:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19029D930B; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:16:38 +0100 (MET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id U99BTOEF0g2l; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:16:37 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [82.130.103.143] (nb-10510.ethz.ch [82.130.103.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mirjak) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEA3CD9305; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:16:37 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <54F8B9A5.5000008@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 21:16:37 +0100
From: =?windows-1252?Q?Mirja_K=FChlewind?= <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>, "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) <jhildebr@cisco. com>" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
References: <20150303155825.32731.37010.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <08728A73-ED15-4928-A5BB-A59EA9E6D785@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMDSMMUByAMOc8gSyMajyKj0ZtZzmFPg+J7bz-6AYkFYhw@mail.gmail.com> <AA3CFF6F-1037-495C-B533-A7EB95CF65DF@cisco.com> <7C6DFF6A-A653-486D-AA39-F8A5FDC0A661@ericsson.com> <76EFE5DD-86C1-476A-BC93-074ACA3A5C88@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <76EFE5DD-86C1-476A-BC93-074ACA3A5C88@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/Zgsia0c9fRg_rybfOQyaudhHrUY>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:18:47 -0800
Cc: "spud@ietf.org" <spud@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Spud] Extensibility (wa New Version Notification for draft-hildebrand-spud-prototype-02.txt)
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:16:42 -0000

Hi Salvatore,

in the slides we are currently preparing for the BoF we have three constraints 
listed:

- Information exposure is declarative
- All entities may trust but verify
- Information must be incrementally useful (e.g. not all nodes might support spud)

I think this narrows down the scope. I bet we will discuss this further in the 
BoF and therefore leave for now this as it is.

Mirja


On 04.03.2015 19:20, Salvatore Loreto wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> extensibility is mentioned in several part of the draft 02,
> however I am missing extensibility be listed in the requirements and assumptions list
> in section 2.
>
> I would like SPUD would permit extension to provide additional info, but at same time
> I would also have a clear explanation on the limitations, i.e. where extensions are effective, when extension
> should be ignored etc.
>
>
> br
> Salvatore
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spud mailing list
> Spud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email