Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 29 July 2016 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493B912DB85 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q7vvBv1DW_4M for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA5D12DBD9 for <spud@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4415; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469797276; x=1471006876; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=pBOGZL1JeJyHUxV1FGYKzqhYj0SK5Nop5FyenBDFNnc=; b=cT8/5BfkjZ4itjOGo7XhF5+JBLLCEragLq0cru1EthazaJKsJPjUX0TJ yJSXaj+OOFHP3Z3WdQwNQcVr96gjoi8KoollfXbQYBzWEhInT4dgfx2K2 qAbfbDW2NeFPbDO5IOVwKWNo64qQYYgQkMamiBO3chjy7eKFMcaY5Mev9 s=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DzCwA6UptX/xbLJq1dhEW0VIJ2hAyGH?= =?us-ascii?q?QKBfgEBAQEBAV4nhF0BBSNWEAsEAQkKKgICVwYNCAEBiC2uRY1uAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDg6IIoJVh0GCWgEEmTODOoFwiVSJVIVskClUgkWBNzqIH?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,439,1464652800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="638163033"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jul 2016 13:01:14 +0000
Received: from [10.61.231.99] ([10.61.231.99]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6TD1EqK009820; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:01:14 GMT
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
References: <CAKC-DJjVF_mQb49BJmHNpt-VkJSX6JHXH8hTbYMm2bEYg3rgwA@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S3636tzxpqjr5b+31sU5vg+8UyekhhR=R-3SUYeQhYvjug@mail.gmail.com> <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E98310462EA@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com> <CALx6S36jXoWZxrbictFD2z3=x8XTU6OAGLw-CJjkxrMwpaouYQ@mail.gmail.com> <073728f6-f532-297f-0289-f6e9142bec62@cisco.com> <CAJU8_nV7jeFmv+4UK8X1KyTL9Xo7bWi3he6vUZnr=Jx-_XFV-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <c22a9729-12c9-a4ee-a0f8-eb7548b3d553@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 15:01:12 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nV7jeFmv+4UK8X1KyTL9Xo7bWi3he6vUZnr=Jx-_XFV-g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vMbfniG79rbviUJN99buDbJIWcmeWj9mu"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/_brCPbXKbnlXuRGZMVlx7IH7amg>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, spud <spud@ietf.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?Mirja_K=c3=bchlewind?= <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com>, Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org>
Subject: Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF)
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:01:18 -0000

Kyle,

On 7/29/16 2:39 PM, Kyle Rose wrote:
>
> No one is going to break the sockets API anytime soon, but having to
> develop a new API for modern protocols would be a nice problem to
> have. First, though, we need to figure out how to route those
> protocols through the boxes that right now assume the entire internet
> runs over a snapshot of TCP from 20 years ago.
>

We now have platforms that lose backward compatibility in as little as a
year.  And so if a transport interface is being rev'd, a developer may
be left to only guess at which point it will be stable.  In as much as
the semantics are changing, that's a problem.

Eliot