Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-hildebrand-spud-prototype-02.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 17 March 2015 05:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2BD1A0072 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EyQZNf6aHnYy for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F131A00D6 for <spud@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.154] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A39022E1F4; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 01:01:43 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNqLPOB1DgNWJg5PsCN+bBmeeBs76dEt-XFU3UxzqYba5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:01:40 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <19F10DC6-ABB2-4990-996B-E30EE1811596@mnot.net>
References: <20150303155825.32731.37010.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <08728A73-ED15-4928-A5BB-A59EA9E6D785@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMDSMMUByAMOc8gSyMajyKj0ZtZzmFPg+J7bz-6AYkFYhw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNrRcMCnWMzBvL0Do16mmiajeR4OJRx36cxnppuaD7+81w@mail.gmail.com> <C0A46E88-A9C2-4EB3-B7B6-2DE20D0B957A@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMDaWrvZM3b7G8FyuiHL0nRO=kWLHjqxQjPjxqtoa1Dq=w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNq3NMP6ynqXmfoaVStFpRjVq70ZupVqt6ZmZutdg96SaA@mail.gmail.com> <6DC4AC2F-7279-4B18-8656-939E787E055D@trammell.ch> <5F294E01-B194-4969-8603-671D57569637@cisco.com> <A5F41169-7BB9-4F6D-8978-356A65E6093B@in-panik.de> <75723F2D-969C-4FBF-81D9-20EC106951EC@trammell.ch> <CAOdDvNqLPOB1DgNWJg5PsCN+bBmeeBs76dEt-XFU3UxzqYba5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/ePQMe9DYKl_cIYF9eKtUDdCSYj4>
Cc: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "spud@ietf.org" <spud@ietf.org>, Joe Hildebrand <jhildebr@cisco.com>, "Philipp S. Schmidt" <phils@in-panik.de>
Subject: Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-hildebrand-spud-prototype-02.txt
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:01:59 -0000

Catching up...

> On 12 Mar 2015, at 1:52 am, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> 
> Perhaps we can apply the question that led to the separation of TCP and IP in the first place: does the path need to see it / can the path do something universally useful with it? Put it in SPUD. Is it end-to-end? Stick it above SPUD, encrypt it, and hide the key from the path.
> 
> I like that as a guiding principle

+1 here too. Nice way to avoid this becoming an application services kitchen sink.

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/