IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spud] discovery

Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Thu, 19 March 2015 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83231A1A7D for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DUvvfe2P_Z48 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9402B1A1A77 for <spud@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEF6D9305; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:53:34 +0100 (MET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7uz9tJgAB94N; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:53:34 +0100 (MET)
Received: from 172-27-222-211.dynapool.nyu.edu (NYUFWA-BORDERNAT-GUEST-02.NET.NYU.EDU [192.76.177.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mirjak) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D049D9304; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:53:34 +0100 (MET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: =?utf-8?Q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CAD62q9V8wg6YrTVmg4px=sBdXZyEYZE0iAUd6mJfmgJnDLEMmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:53:32 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EA33E22E-F0CC-4164-9668-4CE09321BEF3@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <CAD62q9V8wg6YrTVmg4px=sBdXZyEYZE0iAUd6mJfmgJnDLEMmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/lTOiKXbJafOgS4Gq42Gky8D1fHk>
Cc: "spud@ietf.org" <spud@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Spud] discovery
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:53:38 -0000

Hi Aaron,

yes and thanks for asking this question on the list.

Don’t have the perfect answer though. But my current answer is: negotiation is done in the higher layer; two clients of the same app might know if the version the other end is using is Spud-enabled.

However, curious to hear more ideas!

Mirja


> Am 19.03.2015 um 11:48 schrieb Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>om>:
> 
> The draft doesn't say much about how one efficiently determines whether the other end is SPUD-capable so that an application can know whether it can use it.  Has anyone given thought to this?
> 
> --aaron
> _______________________________________________
> Spud mailing list
> Spud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email