IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Sat, 11 June 2016 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249DE12D5A0 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CCN_lDvCaJCL for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nitro.isi.edu (nitro.isi.edu [128.9.208.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EE1E12B02B for <spud@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.184.155] ([128.9.184.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by nitro.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u5B0EEof008104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
References: <85E24D9D-F666-49C3-A022-2F207227A153@trammell.ch> <CAD62q9U7XL8hDqY1VdzuvUvoz0Ec5DDLAS6=kaLxRExu7FY0Kg@mail.gmail.com> <86027402-2F05-4E3B-B9CD-26517A4F007C@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <A4C63A75-9D7E-430E-B986-9981FB929D46@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMBhJ2oCJ1avnGUY4NYTX0VWA_g=YoJSiLcy6u9hJnH-eA@mail.gmail.com> <57573DCF.1030402@isi.edu> <F6BE4EE1-D320-421E-9D86-2F30B2A88792@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <CALx6S35Z7iEp2F7+1PHzAe0qu9st_CNXB9GCzF278HehFiv0Qg@mail.gmail.com> <0f5628e2-a142-8d83-b427-d6b07183cb9e@isi.edu> <CALx6S35KXOioEK60p-m5tGE_H9MWbB=YhJ_sOcW0KP2vR80vvw@mail.gmail.com> <57574C38.6070402@isi.edu> <F44FFD3B-CE7E-45E8-9F04-233C56CA95A0@trammell.ch> <890FE014-D3F8-4D64-8BF8-95B3E4773075@trammell.ch> <CALx6S34jbmaV7vAxr1+-p2HW9i2oKv7Bb138MzsaP71zVh=PQw@mail.gmail.com> <76A9F36B-9C21-4268-8267-16D0D9A78834@trammell.ch> <CALx6S37uONysFMNJgUs430eFEUuNTMuhcYKtCPBPMs5W6godVQ@mail.gmail.com> <780953BA-CE7B-4B17-AB9A-27324246FB86@trammell.ch>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <575B57D6.2080102@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:14:14 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <780953BA-CE7B-4B17-AB9A-27324246FB86@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner-ID: u5B0EEof008104
X-ISI-4-69-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/mtxgHU9ShgJ1MESVV75mFoEKoe0>
Cc: spud <spud@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 00:14:52 -0000


On 6/10/2016 8:25 AM, Brian Trammell wrote:
> ip
>  (EH for path exposure)
> udp
>   dtls
>      (new protocols)
>
> whereas the one I think works is:
>
> ip
> udp
>   plus for path exposure
>     dtls
>       (new protocols)

The former will work with IPsec and is consistent with the Internet
architecture.

The latter is not. A distributed protocol that both relies on IP and is
not consistent with IPsec is, IMO, a non-starter.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email