Re: [Spud] meeting in Prague?
Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> Fri, 03 July 2015 13:21 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B6A1B2F5D
for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 06:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id qqyZiv470bYl for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 3 Jul 2015 06:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trammell.ch (trammell.ch [5.148.172.66])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3181B2F5F
for <spud@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 06:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:26:9c2:b1f3:a723:886d:f5ef] (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:26:9c2:b1f3:a723:886d:f5ef])
by trammell.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 806401A01F5;
Fri, 3 Jul 2015 15:21:49 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_8A829901-7286-4289-8650-3DA1F79D27B7";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5
From: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CAD62q9Wpc0+wtJEhN2WHbaQ0NLNdkp5N8nQjJ9u=6fm5saOWOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 15:21:48 +0200
Message-Id: <01659EBB-E426-44A1-BD85-463312CC3709@trammell.ch>
References: <CAD62q9Wpc0+wtJEhN2WHbaQ0NLNdkp5N8nQjJ9u=6fm5saOWOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/npg6JIIlNKw6anwQFMFLry_-sI0>
Cc: "spud@ietf.org" <spud@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Spud] meeting in Prague?
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>,
<mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>,
<mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:21:53 -0000
hi Aaron, Apologies for not answering this question in advance on the list. > On 02 Jul 2015, at 15:52, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote: > > I see there is no SPUD BoF scheduled in Prague. Will it be on the agenda of another meeting? Will there be informal meetings? There is not a BoF or formal meeting scheduled. In our (BoF proponents') opinion, there is not yet enough clarity on what an eventual WG charter would look like to hold a WG-forming BoF, nor a coherent enough statement of a research question to try to form an RG. A group of us (mainly BoF proponents and presenters) are working on a document outlining potential requirements for transport encapsulation with middlebox cooperation. We plan to submit this Real Soon Now, definitely before the Monday deadline. This document is very much a work in progress -- musings on open questions take up more space than things we think are definite requirements -- but we have tried to capture what we've heard in the ongoing discussion into a coherent basis for further discussion. We hope this document to trigger both list and hallway discussions in Prague. The contributors to this document will also meet in Prague on the Saturday before the IETF to work on the next revision of it. Cheers, Brian
- [Spud] meeting in Prague? Aaron Falk
- Re: [Spud] meeting in Prague? Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] meeting in Prague? Charles Eckel (eckelcu)