IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June

Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> Tue, 14 June 2016 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F003E12DB97 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HXiEuuWm_sMP for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com (mail-wm0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B8312D62F for <spud@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id r5so22173950wmr.0 for <spud@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=gRup0uQKB7oME15cHCpsd0nXXzHwvpl8AXcdHc9M7UY=; b=c7PZdWtzCNRLyR8bXkNGuyO2oAjb5/asUqcuYdwogq8eKwaj95S7Hp4wEMOY6fWCnA Y5ow7czE7xmxXsOZemBEMxb6bVk5k8jxpFCCMr/X02gsGtBynxJEUo4rViNNu+63JmF/ S1e056yLhtmaV5HNH81YjydKpAn130IVEAFbZLIY+20Nrwo678BUd/ksIHxZGQCq602H jKPf/7jQ2qxsPj2sMSQ0LIGy7rMunLVZqYfIFlC5IvzUh4WlVyFNxgzlSuE+3dZ89wCg 5Ag+VUSPxmjwWZpuizJIcLHSWDEXhj2Cc6pHFUP5E/N4RJfxPgJZgizVmZz7Vv+SgMFG /e6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=gRup0uQKB7oME15cHCpsd0nXXzHwvpl8AXcdHc9M7UY=; b=EhFFEE3pHqwRlcedOl4oBRK/tAt5cG3Bx80UQ3qHH1AxAWMZE6CnhIp+4dvBZhgY5v um86IJ5MoomOYHaY+rrHiSqK26AuLTAtuqVb9rs06vWOOAN7BNlhbXyuDIkt6aFBdT8F c8k1aTGW7HZYFStej5O4KQlc4Ncn0esI2BXa65+KQBy0dfVOaZwATjV0oZCoohHyotsE 8rSOeIKVumO+3Gx0LglbF/zcLvjl5RRguXv3a2i8cpyxLTmjpgQtQAOTOXDKScqAbNLU nBFshcRev4TXGu8EVQmZufmNcpTikP+yI5jibtiFU68PV29LxOcw7sbSe4oYVwmpl/xA gVqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI5abkaQG57nZA2vS+gpkHfaFlBvs/BpW6/7VXZMdQg9PelQufg1u/NgyKyQ7NAgJPCNUbjBBNfeTL/MA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.25.129 with SMTP id 123mr4701529wmz.10.1465908334619; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.234.13 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <EA4C43BE752A194597B002779DF69BAE24100840@ESESSMB303.ericsson.se>
References: <85E24D9D-F666-49C3-A022-2F207227A153@trammell.ch> <CAD62q9UiLi1ffGPm=xEXOSH=sqZPv7hYiNBTGvAX52a9dhV8yg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD62q9U7XL8hDqY1VdzuvUvoz0Ec5DDLAS6=kaLxRExu7FY0Kg@mail.gmail.com> <86027402-2F05-4E3B-B9CD-26517A4F007C@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <A4C63A75-9D7E-430E-B986-9981FB929D46@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMBhJ2oCJ1avnGUY4NYTX0VWA_g=YoJSiLcy6u9hJnH-eA@mail.gmail.com> <57573DCF.1030402@isi.edu> <F6BE4EE1-D320-421E-9D86-2F30B2A88792@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <CALx6S35Z7iEp2F7+1PHzAe0qu9st_CNXB9GCzF278HehFiv0Qg@mail.gmail.com> <0f5628e2-a142-8d83-b427-d6b07183cb9e@isi.edu> <CALx6S35KXOioEK60p-m5tGE_H9MWbB=YhJ_sOcW0KP2vR80vvw@mail.gmail.com> <57574C38.6070402@isi.edu> <F44FFD3B-CE7E-45E8-9F04-233C56CA95A0@trammell.ch> <890FE014-D3F8-4D64-8BF8-95B3E4773075@trammell.ch> <57589967.9090004@isi.edu> <37A6D94A-639C-4B9C-B44E-3FD3B5B59071@trammell.ch> <EA4C43BE752A194597B002779DF69BAE24100840@ESESSMB303.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:45:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGTiSu7Lcfq_fdfva1Z5xM0ReQL+tk4UabE7=g7yjGG4CQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Szilveszter Nadas <Szilveszter.Nadas@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114d3cee8ef56805353c615b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/pgW6XeOwPFqR8UGnq1PCBN8kB1w>
Cc: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, spud <spud@ietf.org>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:45:42 -0000

On Monday, June 13, 2016, Szilveszter Nadas <Szilveszter.Nadas@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> > It would be useful if whatever comes out of an eventual PLUS working
> group
> > could be implemented either over UDP or IPv6 EH, since the lack of
> access to
> > EH problem is simply a matter of changing APIs. But I'm not convinced
> that's a
> > hard requirement.
>
> Is a separate protocol number for SPUD also an option? Then the happy
> eyeball mechanism used could also consider that.
>
> Cheers,
> Sz.
>
>
All my concerns with spud and quic would be solved by using a new protocol
number since it would allow for the network to, at scale, identify good
spud/quic traffic from the known bad  udp ddos mess

This network operator concern has been repeatedly ignored since it
is easier to access udp in userspace.

This conflict will not end well if not addressed

_______________________________________________
> Spud mailing list
> Spud@ietf.org <javascript:;>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email